Search results

Where is your Pretrib rapture in Revelation 3, 4 and 5?

LOL. More avoidance. That is all you have. Where is your Pretrib rapture in Revelation 3, 4 and 5?

So, are they sinners? Exactly. There is no future millennium. It began at the first resurrection with Jesus victory. This exposes the folly of Premil reasoning as much as anything. You use this imaginary millennium as a dumping ground for "last days" passages and NHNE passages. Zechariah...

But all the living redeemed are glorified (immortalized) and caught up to meet Christ when Jesus comes. How can they be left behind to procreate in a future millennium? This is deeply unbiblical. The Bible makes clear there is no marriage or procreation in the age to come. Where in Holy Writ...

Do you also believe the wicked followers of Gog and Magog are somehow sinless during a future millennium?

If you look back, he will not address the core issues or the Amil rebuttals. He just goes off in an irrelevant tangent attempting to filibuster the topic of conversation.

Isn't it interesting that no one else is promoting this nonsense - Premil, Amil or Postmil? That is because this is a fairy tale. You are on your own with this. You have invented your own imaginations and no one is buying into it.

This is a major difference between Amillennialism and Premillennialism. Premillennialists cannot seem to let go of the abolished old covenant and move in to the liberty and freedom of the new covenant arrangement. The conditional promises, to disobedient Old Testament Israel, that they failed to...

Of course, I do not accept a future millennium. Of course, Jesus is not on the millennial earth for its duration. Why do you keep saying that? I am Amil. We have been in Rev 20 since the first resurrection. Is Jesus on your millennial earth? Are all the resurrected saints on your millennial earth?

Your sandcastle has fallen. Why can you not admit it. So, according to you, turning your back on Jesus is not sin? Embracing Satan and becoming a follower of him is not sin? Mobilizing in Satan's army to destroy "the camp of the saints" is not sin? Show us one Scripture that teaches that...

When avoidance doesn't work and ad hominem fails, running is all you have.

So deception in the heart of man is now not sin? That is ridiculous. This is what false teaching produces. You are writing your own bible - one that is devoid of truth and logic. Jeremiah 17:9 states: “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”...

I have shown you clear Scripture that highlights the necessity of supporting Scripture with Scripture when it comes to theology. This has been a central element of evangelical Protestantism since the Reformation. Speaking about scriptura sui ipsius interpres, Martin Luther said: “That is the...

You have to avoid these questions as they expose your teaching. To say that people turning their backs on Christ, rejecting His commands, embracing Satan and then attacking the people of God is not sin and disobedience is the utmost folly. How can you expect any Christian to take you seriously...

LOL. Of course not. It is the in-between that you deny. Are you denying that the wicked rise up as the sand of the sea at the end of the millennium and confederate together under the influence and control of Satan and surround the camp of the saints?

Try and divert away from these questions that expose your thesis all you want but it is showing everyone that your beliefs are vain imaginations. Your journey has finally come to a crunching halt.

You really do not get it. Address these simple questions that destroy your sinless sinners nonsense. So, according to you, turning your back on Jesus is not sin? Embracing Satan and becoming a follower of him is not sin? Mobilizing in Satan's army to destroy "the camp of the saints" is not...

Bro, he is trying to divert because his position was exposed and he had no answer. He could not even answer a simple query I asked him. To do so honestly would have exposed his position.

You are so difficult you cannot even understand plain simple language. No wonder your theology is messed up. No wonder you avoid the obvious.

So, according to you, turning your back on Jesus is not sin? Embracing Satan and becoming a follower of him is not sin? Mobilizing in Satan's army to destroy "the camp of the saints" is not sin? Please show us one Scripture that teaches that believers in "permanent incorruptible physical bodies"...