Search results

You are twisting the language to support Premil. This is talking about the NHNE. There is nothing you can do to change what the text says. Isaiah 65:24 says, “They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD, and their offspring with...

In your opinion: are the living in Christ physically resurrected from the dead when Jesus comes - yes or no?

I agree. Sadly, there are many like him. It goes with the badge.

LOL. This is brazen coming from you. Think about this before you open your mouth: you are inventing an extra coming of Jesus, and you are inventing an extra age on top of this age and the age to come, and you are comparing this to a few one-off mentions of passing events in Scripture that are...

Corroboration is an enemy of your theology. That is why you repudiate it. Amils embrace this truth. It reinforces Amil truth. 2 Peter 1:20 that “no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.” The thrust of this text is: it doesn’t matter what your view of a text is, if it...

In your opinion: are the living in Christ physically resurrected from the dead when Jesus comes - yes or no?

LOL. Yah-dee-dah-dee-dah. I understand your frustration at not having any support for your teaching with other Scripture but it is your non-corroborative doctrine that belongs with the other Millennialist cults like the JWs and the Mormons. Premil is an extra-biblical doctrine. It enjoys no...

I am seeing a pattern with you: avoidance is your MO when your beloved Premil is exposed. You tip-toe round the many contradictions in your position with religious cliches. This is what your fellow Premil Pretrib brethren do. I refer you back to my last avoided post.

There is nowhere in the Bible that describes the future physical resurrection as "the FIRST Resurrection of the Saints in Christ at His Second Coming." That belong in your Premil books. That is invented language. How can you make the resurrection of the saints in Christ be "the first...

You obviously have nothing. Isa 65 refers to the new heavens and the new earth. So, according to you, turning your back on Jesus is not sin? Embracing Satan and becoming a follower of him is not sin? Mobilizing in Satan's army to destroy "the camp of the saints" is not sin? Please show us one...

You promote a doctrine that has zero corroboration elsewhere in Scripture. That is why you cannot support Scripture with Scripture. All you are left with is avoidance, chides and ad hominem. That seems to be the Premil way. I thought you were different.

So, like I thought, you have nothing to support your error then.

Where in Revelation 2:10-11 does it even mention "the first resurrection"? You are obviously making it up as you go here. Rev 20:4-6 refers to the first resurrection of Christ - the only first resurrection in Scripture.

But it is you that is calling the future resurrection of the dead in Christ as the first resurrection. The fact is: it has already happened. While we are spiritually and physically raised as a result of the first resurrection of Christ, the first resurrection was an actual literal physical...

It is simple answer. You are obviously on the ropes here.

Not so. Jesus is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18), "the firstfruits of them that slept" (1 Corinthians 15:20), "first begotten of the dead" (Revelation 1:5). Nowhere does it call the future resurrection of the dead in...

Let's cut to the chase: in your opinion: are the living in Christ physically resurrected from the dead when Jesus comes - yes or no?

Stick to the truth and we will agree. This is wrong. You are ducking around multiple posts and Scripture because it exposes your theology. Your position denies that Jesus is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18), "the...

We all agree: "BOTH the Dead & Living (in Christ) recieve their NEW Immortal Bodies = 1 Thess4:13-18 , 1 COr ch15 , 1 John 3:1-3." Where we disagree is: the catching away is different from the resurrection. One needs to be physically dead to be physically resurrected. The living in Christ are...

The redeemed do not get their incorruptible bodies until Jesus comes. Multiple Scripture proves that.