Search results

Revelation 20 is not talking about individual deception. It is talking about the general deception that rested upon the Gentile people before Jesus sinless life, atoning death and glorious resurrection. From the first resurrection, victory spread throughout the darkened Gentile nations. With...

Thanks for taking the time. Ok. There are several issues we disagree on. My biggest struggle is your failure to address my whole line of argument highlighting the spiritual widespread darkness that existed before the earthly ministry of Christ and the resulting great commission to the nations...

So, to reject Christ and follow Satan is not sin in your eyes? What nonsense! So being deceived by the lie of Satan is not sin either? More nonsense! Where does it say that there is no sin in a future millennium to be "passed down from generation to generation"? Open your Bible and read it...

Oh. So, they are mortal believers that are born sinless and remain so for 1000 years until Satan appears whereupon they change sides and sin grossly against the Lord by turning their back on Him by embracing Satan? So, do they all end up in the Lake of Fire?

Do you believe there is a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord?

Yes, it is attacking a fellow believer with a slur. That is all you have. Where is the rapture in Rev 5?

Where in Revelation 3 teaches a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord? Also, where is your rapture in Revelation? There is nothing in it that supports your claims.

Hello! Then, contrary to what you have previously said, you do believe in 2 future physical comings of Christ.

Of course you want to ignore Amils. You have to. That is because you are not comfortable with Amils keeping you to the Book and what it teaches about corroboration. It is this biblical principle that exposes your speculations. Where is your Pretrib proof-text that teaches a rapture of the...

I totally agree. He actually knows he has nothing. He just wants to divert the conversation away from the Book. He knows that he has no support for his private opinions of many texts. In fact, he has no proof-text for Pretrib anywhere. He wants a website to say something and then that makes it...

We are rescued to the sky as the destruction of this current earth, works that are therein, the elements occur. It does not say anywhere that He then takes us to heaven. Where is your Scripture? Give me a rapture passage that says He then takes us to heaven? You have nothing to support that...

Blindness? I once was blind but now I see. Attacking the messenger when you have no biblical evidence is the Pretrib default. Where is your scriptural support? Where is your rapture before Revelation 14?

Cut and paste is all you have. You have no proof-text that teaches your theology. That is why you cannot give it. There are multiple that forbids it.

What is that place that he is preparing? It is the new Jerusalem. The new Jerusalem comes down from heaven when Jesus comes. It is going to be located on the new earth. Read Revelation 3: 11Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown. 12Him that...

But, you said their parents are in their resurrected bodies? That means they are glorified? Hello! All eschatological viewpoints hold that. Also, you have yet to show one Scripture that teaches that resurrected saints can marry and procreate in the age to come. All we are getting is opinions...

LOL. So that makes them sinners then.

Rev 20 shows us the result of His conquering of the grave. It shows us the subjection of the enemy through His victorious work.

You are making all these wild sweeping claims without actual Scripture to prove it. Where in Scripture teaches a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord? Until you prove that, all you have is personal opinions.

Makes sense. I have been studying this subject since 2000. When all the wild claims of that year didn't come to pass, I felt i needed to dig deeper and find what was what for myself. My studies are evolving.

Sounds good. Understand.