Search results

So, it is only the dead in Christ that partake in the Premil first resurrection and overcome the second death when Jesus comes?

Oh. So, refusing to directly address Amil arguments/Scriptures is a rebuttal in your opinion? I don't think so. That is avoidance. A couple of easy questions: What is the first resurrection? Do you believe in corroboration?

David, How about actually highlighting where we are supposedly off. From our perspective, there is a lot of unaddressed Scripture, posts and arguments here. I can only conclude that you have no real rebuttal if you keep avoiding and simply expressing your non-specific opinions. Frankly, this...

I think i am slowing down bro. LOL

LOL. Good minds think alike. You must have beat me by one second.

You are going to have to outline these. So far we are just getting generalities. I think it is only fair for you to address the arguments in the posts presented that are wrong.

LOL. Where is your Pretrib rapture in Revelation? Why not be honest before God and men and admit it is not there. It belongs to the Left Behind novels.

I agree. LOL. It is a delusion of the devil.

Matthew 12:22-29 records, “Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David? But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This...

LOL. There are numerous theological affirmations and hermeneutical statements that I could present to support the Protestant fundamental of supporting Scripture with Scripture. If you took the time to research you would find that out. But I refuse to do so because you reject the clear Scriptures...

LOL. You are the one claiming that. Hello! The burden of proof is with you. Obviously you are forcing that into the text where it does not belong, like you do with a multitude of other things.

You avoided my question again. Do you believe there is a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord?

Where did Darby get it? The first person who formulated this eschatology was a Jesuit named Ribera in 1591AD. He interpreted the book of Revelation suggesting an end-time personal antichrist, a rebuilt Babylon and a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem at the end of the Christian Era. This doctrine...

There is no rapture, no 7 years trib, or no 3rd coming in Daniel 9. How many times are you going to avoid this? If scriptural proof means anything to Pretribbers, I will ask again: Where is there any mention of the Church in Daniel 9. Where is a tribulation mentioned in Daniel 9? Where is a...

The opposite is the truth. You cannot even show us one clear rapture passage that shows a definite period of tribulation after it. You cannot show survivors after Christ's second coming. This is a Jesuit invention that enjoys zero biblical support. The burden of proof is with you to prove what...

LOL. Check mate! Game over! Avoidance is your MO. Do you consider people turning their backs on Christ, rejecting His commands, embracing Satan and then attacking the people of God to be disobedience?

Stop avoiding the obvious. You have no Scripture to support your error. Please show us one Scripture that teaches that believers in "permanent incorruptible physical bodies" marry and procreate on the earth after the second coming?

Where is Rev 20 does it show Christ on earth for 1000 years?

Do you consider people turning their backs on Christ, rejecting His commands, embracing Satan and then attacking the people of God to be disobedience?

Says who? Only if you take Revelation chronological, invent a new age unknown to the rest of Scripture and ignore the climactic detail of Revelation 19. The second coming brings a close to the day of salvation. Repeated Scripture shows that now is the only day of salvation. After showing us the...