Search results

Revelation 4:1-2 has absolutely nothing to do with a secret rapture. In fact, note what it actually says and how it compares to similarly worded passages in Revelation. Remember, the safest way to understand Scripture is to compare Scripture with Scripture. Revelation 4:1-2 commences, “After...

I was waiting for this and Rev 4:1, and after much squeezing you finally came up with it. Where is a rapture mentioned in Revelation 3:10? Where is a 7 yr trib mentioned in Revelation 3:10? Where is a 3rd coming mentioned in Revelation 3:10? Revelation 3:7-13: “And to the angel of the church...

This shows how lacking Pretrib is. It has no biblical-proof-texts. All you are left with is this type of smokescreen. Again, nothing of evidential worth. There is absolutely no mention of a rapture or a 3rd coming in Daniel 9. It is a historic passage already long-fulfilled. This truly sums...

Revelation 20 is a dumping ground for OT passages that make no mention of a future millennium in your theology. That is likely because multiple Scriptures in the New Testament forbid your theology. The picture you have in your head of a sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted future millennial...

You know you have not addressed and identified the rapture and 7-year trib in these passages. The reader knows it. If you had clear Scripture, you would be happy highlighting it and explaining it. Stop avoiding. Stop acting ignorant. Where is a 7-year trib mentioned in Revelation 6 or anywhere...

Where is a future rapture mentioned here? Nowhere Where is a 7-years trib mentioned here? Nowhere. Where is a 3rd coming mentioned here? Nowhere. Where is a future rapture mentioned here? Nowhere. Where is a 7-years trib mentioned here? Nowhere. Where is a 3rd coming mentioned here? Nowhere.

More avoidance. Quote and highlight your future rapture in Revelation 3 and 4 please. Stop avoiding. Also, where is your 7-year trib in Revelation?

What you quote pertains to the one and only coming of Christ. For the millionth time: where in Scripture teaches a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord? Also, where is your rapture in Revelation?

1. Is this blood sacrifice arrangement you promote under the old covenant, the new covenant or a new old covenant? 2. Please explain what these animal sacrifices accomplish in your future millennium? 3. Where in Revelation 20, anywhere in the NT or anywhere in the OT does it says that...

Where does this text mention your imaginary future millennium? Nowhere! You twist Scripture to support your error. You add unto text after text to allow your beliefs to fit. Where does Revelation 20 (your only proof text) mention the return of the old covenant blood sacrifices? Nowhere. Where...

Do you even recognize the covenant under which this promise was made under and the ancient context of the matter? Do you even accept that the new covenant superseded the old? Do these absolutes even matter to you? Or are you so besotted by the old arrangement that you cannot let it go? You are...

The old has gone. Hello! Scripture describes the old covenant sacrificial system as “that which is done away” (2 Corinthians 3:11) and “that which is abolished” (2 Corinthians 3:13). It makes clear: “the old testament … vail is done away in Christ" (2 Corinthians 3:14). Hebrews 10:9 confirms...

Where in Thessalonians? You cannot even give Scripture references or quotes. Where in Thessalonians teaches a rapture of the Church, followed by seven-year tribulation, followed by a third coming of the Lord? This is getting old. Why not be honest and admit you have nothing? Says who? Where...

Here you go again: you promote your own personal beliefs without showing anywhere in Scripture that teaches 2 future comings. That is because you have nothing of biblical worth to bring to the table. If you had it, you would give it.

LOL. You just confirmed my thesis (and that of Amils): Premil is a private interpretation. It has zero corroboration anywhere else in Scripture, despite your previous boasts to the contrary. I said I would prove your claims to be lies and you confirmed it. But will you say sorry for your...

Thanks! The silence of Premils is deafening.

Let's put your claims to the test. If I am wrong, please provide me with clear corroboration for these main tenets: 1. What Scripture, if any, do you consider definitely corroborates the Premillennial interpretation of Revelation 20 that there are two distinct physical resurrection days (the...

This sums up Pretrib: no Scripture to support their error, only childish insults and bitterness against anyone who dares to disagree with their Jesuit teaching. It must be so frustrating holding to a doctrine that is not in the Bible. You do not even have one proof-text. For the millionth time...

Jesus doesn’t matter. The NT doesn't matter. The new covenant doesn't matter. He is obsessed with Judaizing. He is obsessed with pointless worthless blood sacrifices. He is obsessed with the old arrangement. There is no biblical reasoning with him.

The litmus test of sincerity in your eyes is agreeing with you. You are so full of pride and delusions. Pride cometh before a fall. No wonder posters do not take you seriously. I have not seen any poster who avoids rebuttals like you. I have not seen any poster who ducks around the NT narrative...