Search results

I got a million of 'em. :)

It doesn't exactly say that. The scars will remain, I believe.

I'll never learn to stop calling people by name without double-checking. I'm so horrible with names.

Yes, right. Sorry, Mark. :eek:

I would hang around and continue this edifying conversation but I got a thing at a place.

Whatever shall I do?

Did you read it?

Honestly, Mark, I believe that we, along with Christ, the Lord will have exactly the same kind of bodies that Adam and Eve had before the fall, which were very good, according to God Himself. And that, along with the characters formed as a result of regeneration and the witness of the sufferings...

Could it be because it was arrogant, disrespectful, and chock-full of congruency and no Scripture at all?

By the way, anyone got any idea what keeps us from sinning in Heaven?

You're just being intensely and purposely dogmatic. The verse has deep meaning to millions of people who know nothing of the context. And who gets to decide how far context stretches? Apparently, you do. You don't think that the fact that this was part of a conversation with a high-ranking...

You think the Holy Spirit was completely absent before Pentecost?

Oh, but it does. Keep emphasizing "spirits" and see what happens. I don't believe I called you anything. Thank you for participating. :)

You are invited to get over yourself. Thank you for participating. :)

This is absolutely incorrect and you know it. Consider, for example, the most famous text of all: John 3:16. It has stood alone from its context for millions of people for centuries. If anyone supposes that he knows anything, he has not yet known as he ought to know; (1 Corinthians 8:2)

Thank you for participating. :)

I already said yes and no, and explained why. You're officially trolling now.

Then you're golden. No worries. You have triumphed gloriously over me. Congratulations. How impressive. Well, except for the fact that no one uses it that way. If you were a journalist, you'd be spanked and you know it.

Then you would declare the apostle Paul a heretic, too, according to Philippians 2:6-7. It's plain to see why you can't conform to verse 5.

You want me to continue helping you derail the thread? I've already replied to it several times.