Search results

You keep saying, "We disagree." Like I told you before--this is not a discuss, not something our opinions matter in one bit. But it does matter how you/we spend our time until the end, because if we were in disagreement...one of us is against the truth--against Christ. I have not told you my...

"He who is not against us is on our side.”

The problem is, you do not know when the "taking and throwing" occurred. I am sure there were those who had the same reaction to the Lamb "slain before the foundation of the world." Maybe you'll understand in a thousand years. :(

I already answered. Still looking for an excuse, someone/something to blame, fishing?

I have answered these already. You saying "future" is the thinking of men, of the flesh. Those things refer to matters of God, in whom there is no "future." He has broken His true existence down in a way that children can understand--for a time, which is "the same yesterday, today, and...

Your disagreement is your opinion. But we are not having a discussion of opinion. As for the scriptures--Israel never pieced things together either, now you also do not and make all the same mistakes. Nonetheless, everything is in the scriptures, you just can't see it because of your own...

These things...and the correct context...are of God, whom is the same yesterday, today, and forever. "Times" are times, only for explanation, for revelation--the terms are relative to our need to hear line upon line, precept upon precept as all truth unfolds in revelation. The truth includes no...

No.

No.

This (hypocritically) is you breaking context. "Judea" is regarding Israel. You are mixing instead of rightly dividing Israel and the church. How will you ever see clearly, if you won't see things rightly divided? (rhetorical)

No, again you say "future" Jesus said "this generation." Now I am having to repeat myself--but not for long. You seem to want to wait with the dead. As for the context, Jesus spoke of the kingdom of God many times--if you cannot put the pieces all together, you are only blinding yourself, just...

I have disregarded nothing, but have explained it plainly with scripture. But you see it as it was given to those who slumber until the times of the gentiles are fulfilled, and as they taught it. Should we never awaken--never receive all truth in due season? How long will you defend the...

It is not what I believe, but what I know. But again: The words are true, but your premise is off, therefore also your translation. But I will tell it how it truly is: "Future" is an assumption made by those who Christ had not come to "a second time" Hebrews 9:28. Paul does not say "future"...

I have both answered, and spoke the truth. Your rejection is on you.

The 42 months, also referred to as 3.5 years...are "times"...also spoken of by Daniel (also eluded to in the scriptures, as "weeks"): He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall...

You are wrong (and emotionally attached and driven). The scriptures--Jesus said, "soon", "this generation." To the contrary, you say "future" while denying that there is no greater tribulation than that which Christ bore for the sins of the world. These things are anti-Christ. But, go...

As long as you are following the same pattern as Israel, why don't you just say I do this, "By the ruler of the demons?" :rolleyes:

Not "into the first coming", but "soon", "this generation" soon.

You misunderstand me. I did not suggest that Jesus was wrong at all, but confirmed it. You just don't understand what it is that Daniel spoke of, therefore you apparently believe the translations of men in their errors.

It is not for me to retrace your steps...but, here, this is from post #268: I had already given you that order of events, but you denied it of me, and then through it back at me.