Search results

I already explained and compared 7's expectations of something less, as being an offence to Christ, which is true--no tribulation "ever shall be" greater than what He has suffered and does suffer still among us. But if you want to join with those who do not lift Christ up in this regard--so be...

Not at all. Read again the gospels and see the scriptures quoted-- they are quoted correctly, but not all of them as men saw them. Nothing is new.

The words are true, but your premise is off, therefore also your translation.

No, but it is your imagination that has lead you to believe what is not even how God operates. You are acting like, and making the same mistake, as Israel who expected a conquering king, and rejected a Lamb.

It is not my diversion (I diverted only to the truth), but your own basic premise that is off. It was not a diversion--I was attempting to stop you from going over that cliff...but here you are going over it again, but have not reckoned with your own contradiction of terms: "This generation"...

That one statement alone--is blasphemous! He took upon Himself the sins of all the world--great and small...and you make light of it. You belittle Him. Why should I even continue to tolerate you--to give you gifts?! No! You say the words, but do not understand-- Judea, is not "the church", but...

You are apparently not hearing yourself. The fall of all mankind beginning with Adam--is not a "Defection From Truth"--from God?? You explained what I have already told you, then tell me I am wrong, and that you disagree. You just defined what I said--but you do not believe it? That is the...

That only means you misunderstand. You nor I can use one scripture to contradict the other--they must agree, and that is what I have told you.

Again...you speak of the teachings of men, but do not understand the architecture just as those who went before. You are doing exactly what those of Jesus' time did, not thinking a carpenter's son could be God with us, or expecting a Lyon instead of a Lamb. Is it not when and what you least...

Indeed it does. But you do not understand the architecture...and project your shortcomings on me. How will you come to know all truth if you reject every revelation just as those who went before? This is not a debate.

That is the translation and teachings of men. Not the truth.

I told you you had it out of order, and gave you the proper order...now you deny it, but finish with agreeing that order I told you was correct. o_O You are going to have to do better than that.

You left out those taken aboard the ark. But, no, it is the saved, the born again of the spirit of God who are taken, that "if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also." And those left of flesh and blood are rather...

"This generation", "future generation." --That is not even good English. You really don't see the error in that??

By Jesus' own word, there is nothing greater. There is only one event in all the history of the world that meets that criteria. Sorry you don't see it, but look for something more. There is nothing more.

Indeed we are not close enough. But it is only because you do not accredit Christ with having suffered all. Only when you do that, will all truth be given to you.

Read it again--it says "over all the land." And you are wrong about the rest too. But why go there just yet? You have it wrong from the start.

Says who? Prove it.

Indeed He did.

Tell me...what is more great than the abomination of Christ crucified--which takes away of the sacrifice, the Lamb slain since the foundation of the world? But again...your compass should have pointed you to Christ. Therefore you are groping in the dark.