Search results

Daniel 9:2 says: “In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. And I set my face unto the Lord God, to seek by prayer and...

It is 100% true. It is your interpretation that is messed up. This is a classic example of manipulating Scripture to fit your doctrine. Clearly, both the method and the doctrine are wrong, thus the conclusion is wrong. William E Cox says in his book Biblical Studies in Final Things: “the...

Agreed!

Ok. Thanks. Can you expound them in your own words? Please do not give me other men's opinions. They cannot respond when their error is exposed.

Can you give me another example in Scripture of such a decapitation of a harmonious time-period - like where God says 7 days and He didn't mean a linear, congruent and sequential 7 days, or 7 years and He didn't mean a linear, congruent and sequential 7 years, or 70 years and He didn't mean a...

Exactly bro. Spot on!

All Pretribbers can do is point you to their teachers (links), who will never come on forums like this and let their error be examined. That is just a cut-and-paste he did.

Before I reply in more detail, I need to highlight, this is not your own writing. This is copied again from another outside link. This is what Pretribbers do. This is more proof that Pretribbers cannot think for themselves. They just rabbit what they have been taught. That is because Pretrib...

OK then, will you quote these passages in full and identify where the rapture of the Church is in each of these, followed by the seven-year tribulation, followed by your third coming? I don't see it. Every single passage that you quote can be used by posttribbers. So, you're going to have to...

Robo response. You have to because your beliefs have been ably and repeatedly exposed. It is pointless engaging with you any more as you refuse to address the rebuttals. That is why few are engaging any more with you. I am going to do the same, as it is pointless. Your cut-and-pasting the same...

The beast/antichrist/man of sin have been about since before John or Paul. This totally blows apart your whole thesis.

You are so besotted with antichrist that you cannot see Christ in the Word of God. You are arguing with the text. There is no "a" man there. It is simply says “man.” You are adding unto Scripture. Thayer Definition: anthrōpos 1) a human being, whether male or female 1a) generically, to...

Col 3:9 Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; Col 3:10 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him: Upon the new birth, the believer takes on Christ. This results in the believer being changed or...

Not so! This is false advertising. This is fake news. This reveals how you function. Why do you not tell the truth and say it is "my friend's new channel"? After all, he is not a real pastor, he is a wantobe pastor.

That spirit of antichrist 1 John 2:18-23: “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would...

Most Bible scholars of whatever persuasion identify “the beast” with “antichrist” and the “mystery of iniquity”. They believe that they all refer to the same entity. Other titles include, “that man of sin,” “the son of perdition,” and “that Wicked” one. The reason why many good Bible scholars...

Exactly. You have nothing to say. That sums up your position. It is devoid of substance.

You are the one insisting that "he" and "him" proves that the beast is a literal man. But when we present the detail attributed to this man you symbolize it away. How convient! What then do these 7 heads and 10 Horns represent?

Hello! You are adding to Scripture. It says man - as in mankind! Why can you not see that? Why do you avoid the detail of each posters posts? You have to. It exposes your error. The word for man here (“anthropos”) is the generic word for mankind, which includes men and women. Six is actually the...

So, you are deceiving the reader. He is not a real pastor. Why do you not tell the truth and say it is "my friend's new channel"?