Search results

You expect people to address your arguments, but you refuse to address their arguments. That is because your theology does not abide scrutiny, and you know it. I have addressed your error numerous times. You have avoided numerous times. Avoidance is your MO. Robot posting is what you do.

None of this makes sense. Pretribs do not come close to answering in any kind of credible, coherent, reasonable or convincing way how there is a rapture of the Church followed by a prolonged tribulation followed by a 3rd coming of Christ. And, yes, most don't even try because they know it is not...

So, why have you got a pastor's link at the bottom of your posts if you are not a pastor and do not attend a church that promotes your Unitarian beliefs?

Why can you not address counter arguments? Please stop avoiding. It is only serving to expose your theology.

Explain what you mean by the expression "Jesus is God"?

Why do you refuse to answer the question: what do you mean by "Jesus is God incarnate"?

You better sort out your HTML. So, why have you got a pastor's link at the bottom of your posts if you are not a pastor and do not attend a church that promotes your Unitarian beliefs?

Here we go again. Total avoidance and robo response. 666 is the number of “man,” not the number of “a man.” There is no “a” in the original Greek. It was added by the translators, most of whom believed the Pope was thee antichrist. The Greek simply reads: gár (for) esti (it is) arithmós...

LOL. You are the one insisting that "he" and "him" proves that the beast is a literal man. But when we present the detail attributed to this man you symbolize it away. How convient! What then do these 7 heads and 10 Horns represent?

2 Timothy 3:16-17 makes a similar statement, only from the opposite point of view, saying, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto...

I have addressed two of seven weaknesses in your position below, but you still cannot answer it. All you have is your usual robo response. I will repeat it: Revelation 17:8 states, “The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition...

If you cannot address the arguments above then admit you are in error and change, instead of throwing out all your unnecessary insults. Until you do, i will take your avoidance as a smokescreen to hide your error.

Answering 1 point out of 7 proves nothing, apart from you are habitually evasive. In fact, you expose the fragility of your mode of interpretation by your avoidance. You are happy to spiritualize the water but adamantly against spiritualizing the beast. That is so because it would destroy...

I couldn't honestly care less what you think. You have no answer to the biblical facts. I have already proved it is impossible for the beast to be a human being. I have demonstrated how nonsensical your beliefs are, but you reject that truth. 1. The beast has been around for over 2000 years...

Could be.

I have started to skip his posts. It is all cut-and-paste. It is like interacting with a robot.

Are you saying that the Roman soldiers were commanded by the Lord?

Great post!

The answer is: yes!

You did say that! You have spent days trying to disprove that biblical fact. So, is Jesus partially God? What does "God incarnate" mean to you?