Search results

1. Language Usage. O' is short for OF. OF does not mean IS. "Of" is a preposition, which connects 2 things. "In" is another preposition. If one were to say Fred is "in" the house, it does not mean you are a house ... No one is denying Jesus is OF God - servant, apostle, priest, lamb, son, word...

What verse in Scripture says that?

The effect of IDOLATRY, put above the most important commandment - above love of God and love of each other. Image bearers of God having nothing in common?! Really. You, @Aunty Jane and I have everything in common but mere manmade doctrine.

So, David and all his descendants are God?! Wow!

Modern. I speak Groot AND 21st American. Different strokes for different folks. KJV is error ridden, archaic and the worst translation available in English today. It is the most important book written in (Middle) English but its day in the sun is over.

Pure Ad Homenim. You wrote Notice how you are not on record with what Russia's actual agenda is? You are in the know while claiming people who actually listened to Putin are "uninformed." Again, I've flipped the script. You say Pacifists never see a reason for war. I say war mongers never see...

We can all be better at witnessing. My Pastor said if you are going to witness for God, make sure you are a good witness. There is such a thing as Adverse Witness. Sadly, many Christian’s are Adverse Witnesses. I wonder if you started this thread for God’s glory - or your glory?

I no longer believe America will recover from the rot of Cultural Marxism, feminism, race baiters, alphabet people, open borders, debt, lawfare and other corruption etc, and relentless indoctrination against the institutions that made America great. I wish Christ had already returned.

This is a Debate forum but its not the debate I suspect @Illuminator expected in starting the OP. It would be nice if Christians could be united and not tear each other down all the time. Here is how I propose some reconcilliation. I agree @Illuminator, Disney had a bad year. Money is not the...

Bark! Bark! Bark! Keep barking up the wrong tree! Orange man bad. Orange man bad. Orange man bad. It's all about public policy 1st. Why is the death of 400K Ukranians OK with you? If you were a peacemaker, your discernment would be able to think in terms of justification for peace.

Ad Homenim. As ignorant as I apparently am, the war mongers have not spelled out the justification for peace. You are like a broken record, "Russia", "Russia", "Russia". Ever consider the globalist's (NATO & Left's) actual agenda with provoking Russia AND war mongering by giving Ukraine the...

@Marymog cannot grasp the question of this thread. She thinks the burden for peace only rests on one side. Her side can provocate with impunity. Sad but it shows how totally effective indoctrination is. When it comes to Mary, the propaganda was successful.

The explanation is profoundly simple. It is not about the man but public policy. This is why all the attacks against him don't lower his polling numbers. His enemies are barking up the wrong tree. If you want the public to support another candidate, explain how their public policy positions are...

In my conversations, these folks deny a rejection criteria. What an intellectual trick; assert X and deny it can be proven false!

I love how strong folks are into eisegesis. Let's take a looksy at the one verse held out to show that God has a God. Hebrews 1:8-9 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition 8 But of the Son he says, “Your throne, O God, is[a] forever and ever, and the scepter of righteousness is the...

ROFLMAO. A way to pretend you are not having to concede the point.

Appeal to Strawman. I've heard it said that a certain man is his own man but that is not what we are talking about is it? There is no verse in all 66 books where it says God has a God or, as you put it, is his own God. It is a Circular Reference, akin to the Royal We.

Only if eisegesis is allowed. It is strong evidence against a 3-in-1 God. Imagine that there are 3 owners to a company. Odd it would be if one owner acknowledged only the existence of one other owner in being "the owners" of the company.

Brilliant! I look forward to the erudite reply but would be surprised if an Ad Homenim rejoinder awaits.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/major-victory-russian-army-ukraine-forces-flee-eastern-city