Search results

No but we do have the 25A. See sections 3 & 4.

I thought the same thing. Encyclopedic knowledge, Tucker said. I agree.

The first casualty of war is the truth - and this is NOT the truth. Alan Dershovitz explained it was under the National Archives act that was passed to assist presidential record keeping in preparatoin for their library and contains no pejorative penalties whatsoever. The Deep State may have...

Right, aka a distraction. I’m not going to play your games. If you don’t want to a see my question, feel free to post elsewhere.

I’m not making an argument. That is your basic problem in reading what I wrote. It’s about believability of the record of his 40-days post resurrection. All this nonsense of ‘sufficient’ and we have what we ‘need’ is just a theological distraction. I’m not asking should we believe what is...

I asked the question and this was not the question.

Did you believe because of what was written or because you had an encounter with the living God?

See OP. If you met someone who came from from the dead who stayed with you for 40 days, would you only write their introductory and concluding remarks on Day 1 and Day 40 or would you record each day?

Completely backwards. All men die, only Jesus rose again in a glorified body. This explains why the most important day of the year among Christians is Resurrection Sunday (aka Easter).

The question is not about sufficient @quietthinker and @Aunty Jane but believability of what is not written. Imagine seeing a guy return from the dead for 40-days? All you write is a few introductions and final words? You wouldn’t record every days interactions? Every conversation Jesus had...

Better than sounding like you, a Deep State globalist propaganda bot. I am in the record for opposing war with Russia.

Hyperbole is not really responsive to the point.

Thanks Peter for giving me the chance to explain myself better. The mosaic law never applied to us Gentiles. ‘Under the law’ is a loaded phrase, a bit esoteric. Compare to the common expression ‘under arrest.’ Although we may not be always ‘under arrest’ the potential is always there...

Really?! You are comparing believing Jesus is the Messiah but not believing they didn’t write every single of the 40-day post resurrection experiences in detail to not believing Jesus is the Messiah?

You didn’t have to mention it. The point still stands; the relationship between righteousness and the law - as demonstrated in general terms, also applies to the specific application.

Looks like his name was carefully chosen , @PossibleThrowawayAccount. No replies to OP.

He'll undoubtedly draw another false moral equivelance. Mexico has bio-labs, You're saying we should invade Mexico because they have bio-labs.

Is corruption right or wrong? You have no logic and no facts to support your claims. Your claim was that Ukraine did NOTHING wrong. I refuted this claim with facts. Rather than admit that there exists such a thing as justification for war, you double down and pretend my argument is far weaker...

You are a dodger. You said Ukraine has done nothing wrong, as if they were innocently laundering money from all over the world when Putin invaded for no reason at all. Rearding what does justify any country, like Hamas, to invade any country, like Israel, you are appealing to the fallacy of...

With all do respect, I think you are confusing things. We live by many things; speaking the English (21st century American); drive on RH;, diet & exercise; work and rest; stand by my family, friends and neighbors; follow laws at local, state, national and international laws and regulations...