Search results

Hello! 1 Thessalonians 5:1-7 and 2 Peter 3:3-13 are talking about what happens at the coming of Christ, not some imaginary time 1000+ years after the second coming. What they describe is sudden. It is climactic. It involves wholesale destruction. To deny that is to deny the actual wording of the...

Your ongoing refusal (or inability) to directly address other posters rebuttals exposes the various contractions in your position.

No, you did not. You are avoiding the obvious. Where in the NT does it call the ungodly "those who follow Christ"? You know this is nonsense.

The 69 weeks (7 + 62) were to measure unto the commencement of Messiah’s earthly ministry. However, the passage makes it clear that immediately “after” the 69 weeks “shall Messiah be cut off.” That leaves us with only one other unfulfilled week – the 70th week. So, where in this final week is...

Where in the NT does it call the ungodly "those who follow Christ"?

How does Scripture define "Christian"? Please quote supporting text. I don't care what Wikipedia says.

Your position has been strongly refuted by many posters Amil and Premil. You have no Scripture to support your error. You have previously said: Are you saying that "Russia" today is a Christian country ruled by a Christian leader who is hearing from God and implementing His will? Are you...

Why do Premils constantly avoid the biblical rebuttals? Because they have no answer to it! They have to sidestep the sacred text!

Christ, Paul the Apostle and the New Testament writers actually did the opposite to what you are doing. Putting a question mark over the authenticity of someone's profession is completely different from you deeming ungodly people Christian. You are doing the opposite to them! That is what I am...

What has Matt 13.52 to do with your thesis?

Yes. But there is nowhere that he talks about unbelievers being "Christian" like you so liberally do.

LOL. And that is exactly what you are doing, only worse. It is about 13 posts back since you gave us a scriptural reference. Even then, you refused to quote the inspired text. If you did your beliefs would be exposed as wrong.

When are you going to start?

The old covenant prophets anticipated the Messiah coming to introduce His spiritual kingdom. The New Testament writers applied the fulfilment of the kingdom prophecies to Christ’s first advent, and His rule to His resurrection. The ancient prophets received their revelation direct from the...

Mentioning his name and then misrepresenting him is wrong. It doesn't cut it.

Yes, but that is all in your own head and totally contradicts the NT depiction of the kingdom and how and when it unfolds. You fail to accept that the old has gone forever. That arrangement you promote will never return. It was focused on the nation (singular), whereas we have moved on to the...

First, you are misrepresenting Paul the apostle. Not surprisingly, you present no Scripture to support your claims. This is (sadly) a common trait for you. Secondly, you are building your argument upon that false misrepresentation. Your argument is therefore built upon sand here.

How can it be the millennium when it is related to "the last days"? There is no mention of a supposed future millennium.

You have absolutely nothing, and you know it. You just keep misrepresenting Genesis 17. That prophecy is simply talking about the Gospel going to the Gentiles. That is it. You have no biblical basis for your claim of Christian theocracies. You have nothing. It's a figment of your imagination. To...

Are you relating this passage to the here-and-now?