Search results

Do you notice that he never actually addresses any rebuttals that posters present that forbid his Dispensationalism? All he can do is cut-and-paste the same 3 or 4 posts over and over again. We just need to keep on exposing that. If he actually addressed what others wrote he would be forced to...

You make it up as you go. As has been highlighted by others, when you have nothing in the inspired text, you think by inventing a thing and repeating a think it makes it compelling. No! That is not the way it works. It exposes before everyone that you have nothing. Your opinions are...

Not true. Your posts are getter shorter and shorter and more evasive because you have no viable explanation. General unqualified phrases like “all,” “all nations,” “the quick (or living) and the dead,” “every man,” “every eye,” “every one,” “men,” “man,” “all men everywhere,” “the flesh of all...

The difficulty Amils have with Premil is that it places a meaning on the Old Testament passages that do not fit with the consistence teaching of Scripture and which conflict with the fuller and clearer revelation of the New Testament. It seems like Premils take advantage of the vaguer and more...

You have proved nothing apart from the fact you have no answer for the climactic detail of Luke 17, 2 Peter 3 and Rev 19. All these show the wholesale and inescapable destruction that accompanies Jesus return. You have (understandably) been unable to explain that away. Frankly, you are winging...

You have cut-and-pasted a lot of this 67 times. There should be a rule against that. We might as well deal with a robot. We might actually get more variety, interaction and sense from one of them.

I showed you a list of watertight proofs why this cannot be a single man and you ducked around all of them. You have to. To address it would force you to abandon your Dispy beliefs.

It is pointless engaging with you. You refuse to address the arguments of others. Cut-and-paste is all you have. It is like interacting with a robot.

You seem incapable of addressing those who rebut you. You prefer your cut-and-pastes. That is a convenient trait to have whenever your theology is exposed. I refer you back to my avoided posts. When you read Scripture (in Daniel and Revelation) re the beast it is figurative language, something...

Daniel 9:27 says, “And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” “for” Before advancing into this matter further let us first note: the word “for” is not in the original text. It was an English...

Impossible! 1. The beast has been around for over 2000 years (Revelation 17:8, Revelation 17:11-13, 1 John 2:18-23, 1 John 4:1-3, 5-6, 2 John 1:7, and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-13). No man has lived that long on earth. Only a wicked spirit or an evil empire could possibly fulfil that portrayal. 2...

Daniel 9:27 says, “And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured...

My idol is Christ. Who or what is yours?

All you can do is cut-and-paste or chide people. You have a difficulty with addressing other peoples arguments. That is why you are holding on so tight to major elements of Dispensationalism. You are one step away from becoming a Premil.

Agreed! It is obvious!

Exactly. Some people just like arguing for arguments sake.

Again, your battle consists of your opinions. That is all we are getting from you. That is all you can give us. You have nothing biblically to rebut the Amil arguments here. This is such a one-sided discussion. Why not just admit you were wrong? That is better than explaining away literal text...

You avoid so much biblical evidence from other posters in order to facilitate your speculations. Your fly-by evasive replies do not cut it. They expose how bereft you are of biblical evidence. Address the arguments presented to you please.

Christ is not coming as Saviour of the world at the end but as its Judge. This is a solemn day for the wicked. Here we see the great final battle of the ages between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness. On one side on earth you have the wicked confederacy of the beast’s armies on...

Why are you teaching others on elementary basics like this when you don't know what you believe?