Search results

Exactly! So, when are you going to apologize?

Not only that, but, you are thin-skinned and a magnet for offence. This is a terrible concoction. An example of this is found above when I simply highlighted the fact that the only thing that matters is Scripture, not your opinion. This caused you to venomously and unfairly attack me. That is...

Not so. That is where you are at your best. And i said: "pride, bitterness, deceit and ad hominem." That is a toxic concoction!!!

No, we reject and resist pride, bitterness, deceit and ad hominem.

We "Amils." And, yes, we are close and communicate privately about your toxic attitude.

Your posts have gradually got shorter and shorter and increasingly more evasive because you have no answer to those two climactic Scriptures we have discussed. You never will, because they forbid Premil. You know it! You failed to address my main points. You have to do that. I will repost. 1...

No Amil is going to take lectures from you. Please keep your insults and ad-hominem to yourself. This is what Premils do when they are cornered. The fact is, it is you who is a master spiritualizer on the NT. Little is literal in the climactic Scriptures. It must be symbolized away.

Premil evidence consists of them repeating what they have been taught. This does not cut it. It never will.

No one expects you to apologize for your lies or ad hominem. That is not what you do. The fact is, you have given us nothing to support your claims that children of the devil are "Christian" (or followers of Christ). You are winging it. You never will. It is simply not there. It is you that is...

You like to play the victim. It is wearisome engaging with you. Why not apologize for falsely accusing me? Why do you never do that?

You cannot help but throw ad-hominem even when no insult was intended. You need to have a serious look in the mirror. Start with identifying what the word "Christian" actually means.

What are you talking about? Opinion - period - means nothing. That was my simple point. Nothing more or nothing less. That has been my mantra on these forums for years. I am looking hard Scripture. Your problem is, you are too thin skinned. You are always looking offence. It is time to chillax.

What event will/did "finish the transgression"? What event will/did "make an end of sins"? What event will/did "make reconciliation for iniquity"? What event will/did "bring in everlasting righteousness"? What event will/did "seal up the vision and prophecy"? What event will/did "anoint the most...

You cannot answer scriptural refutals. All you can do is cut-and-paste from yours teachers. You duck around every response.

Please show us this in the text. Your opinion counts for nothing.

It is pointless engaging with a robot.

No millennium mentioned here. You need to force it into the text. Premils have to do that with countless Scriptures. It is called adding unto Scripture, something forbidden by the Holy Ghost.

Yes. But not for 1000 years, but, "for ever and ever.."

Years of engagement on this subject reveals that Premils are not the true literalists. They explain away so much simple straightforward Scripture.

I have never seen anyone who blatantly ignores posters points and robotically cuts-and-pastes evasive replies. Does he not see how this looks to others?