Search results

The time period mentioned (a thousand years) relates to a long period of assumed delay before the coming of Christ, not some supposed time period after it. After showing us the destruction of this earth, the works that are in it, the heavens, the elements when Jesus comes, and after describing...

Yes, he shows it to be totally destructive and climactic.

Where does it teach that?

You say that but present no proof apart from your own opinion. That is because there is nothing in the NT to support your contention. However, there is much in the NT that forbids your theory. Premils want to literalize that which is spiritual and spiritualize that which is literal. The kingdom...

I find that rich coming from a Premil, when Premils disagree on everything. What points are Amils (plural) disagreeing on here?

Not so. That is why you avoid every single point.

He did! He took their eyes away from natural earthly temporal matters and put it onto the supernatural. You don't want to acknowledge that because it would expose your position.

Where do you come up with this stuff? Do you believe Satan and his minions are physical beings? Is the dragon in Revelation 20:2 a literal physical dragon? Is the serpent in Revelation 20:2 a literal physical serpent? Is the key mentioned in Revelation 20:1 a literal metal door key? Is the...

Finally, Premillennialist realize that we are the true literalists. They explain away so much in order to let their doctrine fit.

1. False prophet is false religion. I've already explained the beast. You obviously have reading difficulties as well. 2. The false prophet is doing that now. It is figurative language describing the false prophet and the beast working in tandem. 3. Yep! Deception. 4. That is the heart of God...

I'm not exaggerating, I was actually going to joke, the next thing is, you are going to do is go to Wikipedia for justification for your theology. And guess what? You did! It does not matter one iota what the world or Wikipedia believes "Christian" means. It is a sad indictment on your...

Ok. I must give you the benefit of the doubt. I apologize if I misrepresented your motives.

Please do not accuse anyone on this board of having a root of bitterness when your venom is being poured out in such an extreme manner. You are clearly a very bitter and frustrated figure.

You have no biblical basis for your claim of Christian theocracies. You have nothing. It's a figment of your imagination. To achieve your theory, you must redefine what Christian actually means. However, biblically you do not have a foot to stand on. That is why you must depend on secular...

You're the last person that I'm going to take lectures from on this subject. You are the master of Ad Hominem.

This debate has been already won. You admitted the source of your argument was secular sources. I asked you: Are you saying that "Russia" today is a Christian country ruled by a Christian leader who is hearing from God and implementing His will? Are you saying that "Germany" today is a...

No, it is not. I find it particularly troubling that you carefully cut this quote short to give the impression that Justin supported your position. He did not! He opposed it. Your whole thesis is skewed and misleading. It fits in with how you twist the facts to suit your paradigm. That is your...

You are obviously doing it deliberately.

Study more and you will see what he really taught, rather than what you wished he taught. He believed in a general resurrection and a general judgment, culminating in all the wicked being destroyed at the second coming. His future millennium was a perfect pristine arrangement. This is the...

Exactly. Please read it instead of always forcing your false beliefs into these ancient writings. Justin is teaching here that only "some" of national ethnic Israel would be "found" to be "children of Abraham." Only those that are "in the lot of Christ." In Justin's eyes Israel was/is the NT...