Search results

I hate the way you deliberately mislead the reader. It would help if you did due diligence before quoting the ECFs in support of your position. It would prevent yourself from misrepresenting them and showing your ignorance. You do this all the time and it only serves to expose your lack of...

You are quick to speak on behalf of your opponents and slow to listen to how your brethren actually understand the whole dynamic between Israel and the Church. You commonly disparagingly throw the “Replacement Theology” charge at those you disagree with, without any effort of trying to ascertain...

The historic facts contradict your opinion: The Lord showed Himself under every aspect and truly to be the strong man, saying that one can in no other way "spoil the goods of a strong man, if he do not first bind the strong man himself, and then he will spoil his house." Now we were the vessels...

This is simply not true. Like ancient and modern Amillennialists, Irenaeus believed in the current binding of Satan. He believed this happened through the life, death and resurrection of our Lord. He also believed in the destruction of Satan at the second coming. This meant he did not see him...

You obviously have nothing. You have been using that single quote this whole thread and it has been ably exposed as not saying remotely what you are foisting upon it. You have obviously nothing to support your thesis apart from taunts and insults. You couldn't even answer my simple question in...

The venom is coming from you. The quotes speak for themselves. I refer you back to my last post to the evidence. The problem is: you hate being challenged when you present historic and biblical inaccuracies. But i will continue to do it. It is unacceptable.

I find this brazen coming from you the ad hominem Commander-in-Chief on this board.

Lactantius did not source his beliefs in the writings of Irenaeus, he received them from the pagan Sibyl prophetesses. Here is the evidence: as the Sibyl testifies and says:-- "For then there shall be confusion of mortals throughout the whole earth, when the Almighty Himself shall come on His...

As I have previously told you Victorinus (in AD 270) and Lactantius (writing between AD 304 and AD 311) believed this. Think about this. This is 240 years after the cross. That is go back nearly as long as we are looking back to the formation of the United States. This was unheard of before...

Absolutely! The Greek word for "first" (as in first resurrection) is protos. It is a contracted superlative meaning foremost (in time, place, order and/or importance). So which is the "first" (or protos) resurrection - Christ's or the resurrection that occurs at the second coming? This is a...

I was not suggesting Premil is heretical or Premils are heretical. I was saying the first Premils to advance this doctrine as we know it today were heretics.

LOL. Your doctrine just sank in disgrace. It means nothing what you think a "theocracy" is anymore when your "Christian State" invention (that you link it to) has just been proved to be a figment of your imagination. It enjoys zero biblical support.

LOL. Thanks for admitting your beliefs are extra-biblical. You are only conceding what we have all known for years. You have been winging it! Check mate!

You are totally diverting the subject, and you know it. You are talking here about a congregation of the local church meeting together. What you were previously teaching was so-called "Christian nations." Where is this teaching in the NT. Stop avoiding! Why not admit you have nothing? Why not...

That sums up where you get your info. Where is this in the Bible? Or, does that not matter anymore?

Stop avoiding: where does the NT use "Christian" nominally as meaning the citizens of a "Christian State" that can be Christian in name only or a genuine Christian?

Are you saying that "Russia" today is a Christian country ruled by a Christian leader who is hearing from God and implementing His will? Are you saying that "Germany" today is a Christian country ruled by a Christian leader who is hearing from God and implementing His will? Are you saying that...

Do you even know how a theocracy works? The leader is God's representative to speak on His behalf and implement the order of God in the nation. There are no theocracies under the new covenant. God's people (Jew and Gentile) are viewed as an harmonious whole. They are a singular nation. In His...

Who cares what your opinion is, or what a secular dictionary says. This is getting so old. Where does the NT use "Christian" nominally as meaning the citizens of a "Christian State" that can be Christian in name only or a genuine Christian?

You are promoting Dispensatanism again. If Jesus wanted to overcome the Roman empire He could've done. That was nothing to do with His mission. You make the same mistake as the Pharisees and the early Premil heretics. Where do you get that? In the Left Behind novels. I present what Scripture...