Search results

Exactly! Amen bro! Go through his posts to me and read the venom he spews out on these threads. It is ridiculous for a professing Christian. He's only here to filibuster. He has no answer to any of the arguments.

You are the one stirred up and embittered. Don't put that on anyone else. Don't speak on others behalf. I do not give a hoot about your criticism. It is you that is thin-skinned and filled with ad-hominem. I have witnessed your taunts and false charges for years.

This thread has clearly demolished your whole thesis. Your malice is palpable. You are spiteful to the end.

Agreed. That is all we are getting lately. It is ridiculous. Mind you, if i was a Premil i would be frustrated with nothing having anything to bring to the table.

Op Note Continued Tertullian wrote in Against Marcion Book III (Chapter 24): As for the restoration of Judæa, however, which even the Jews themselves, induced by the names of places and countries, hope for just as it is described, it would be tedious to state at length how the figurative...

Op Note The ironic thing is: in keeping with the early Amillennialists, many of the early Chiliasts emphasized the New Testament heavenly spiritual hope rather than an earthly carnal one, as most contemporary Premillennialists promote. They spiritualized the fulfillment of Israel's hope...

You have a lovely way with words. No evidence plus no evidence equals no evidence. :)

Check mate! Pretrib has no proof-text, and Premil has no corroboration. You just confirm what the rest of us know.

Like i said. You have nothing. If you had you would show it.

I know that belief. I used to hold to it. What i am asking is: where does it teach that in the Bible? ... and, no, there is no valid supporting Scripture for Premil. That is why you cannot produce it.

This is a total distraction. How does this support your opinion of Rev 20? There is nothing here that addresses the issue. This avoidance just serves to reinforce my point do you have nothing to support your private interpretation. This is all your own words and speculations. This is typical of...

Evasive sound bites are all you are left with. You do not present hard biblical evidence because you do not have it. Your cry is "what saith Rev 20." That is the Premil mantra. Every other passage presented is dismissed if it disagrees with your opinion of Revelation 20. Premil has only got one...

Well put!

These are the obvious and tragic implications of the Premil viewpoint.

I accept this.

You are not addressing my point. God's Word is addressed to people living on this earth that are controlled by time, which He gave us. If God didn't speak about the end of time, the end of this age and of the end of this world in His Word then you would have a good argument. But He does, so it...

Stop avoiding the evidence. Scripture often makes broad general sweeping statements. When Scripture tells us that the Gentiles would no longer be deceived it does not mean every single one of them, or even most of them, would be saved, just that the ignorance would be finally lifted from the...

Granted, He works and abides in eternity, but we abide in time and space. God's Word is addressed to people living on this earth that are controlled by time, which He gave us. If God didn't speak about the end of time, the end of this age and of the end of this world in His Word then you would...

First of all, it will never happen. Secondly, think about it: do you really believe that Satan is going to be able to turn the hearts of the millennial kingdom at his mere appearance? The so-called future Premil millennium of peace, prosperity and plenty descends into an unmitigated farce at...

Once again, you avoid every Scripture and argument presented, and just present your faulty opinion as your evidence. It is the biblical facts that constantly expose (and forbid) your private non-corroborative interpretation. You and Randy K seem to sing from the same hymn sheet.