Search results

You have announce yourself as being a follower of Satan. As such, those words do not pertain to you. If you want to come under those words, you will have to change your position...while there is still time.

Not exactly, that would be a misrepresentation of things. Yes, Jesus is the Word, and every word is to all. But all were not charged with the law - subject to it, yes, but not charged with it. The point is, that Jesus fulfilled the law for those who were charged and for those who were not, but...

That was then - two thousand years ago. But even then we had already entered into "the times of the gentiles", the times of "God pouring out His spirit upon all flesh", and having "another Helper." But speak for yourself, I know what I have told you from God Himself. As I said, believe what you...

That's cool, but Paul was speaking to two groups during the greatest transitional time in history: to the dead in Christ as well as to the living in Christ, and that passage was for the dead, whom are the first fold saved by Christ, that being Israel. But during these times of the gentiles (the...

Think what you will, but I was speaking of what I know.

You saying the cause is not the effect, again just shows your lack of understanding the whole truth. Nonetheless, the cause and the effect for both events are the same. And Who is in control - men, you say? Not men, but God.

Have you forgotten that the confounding of language was not of men, but of God. Will you now also blame Him for doing the same? This you do because you do not fully understand. "Who is blind but My servant?"

Well...if you are going to seek correction, allow me to clarify: The law is no longer here to correct, but was (during the times of Israel before the coming of Christ). Now, we need only believe their and His story of salvation and deliverance through His sacrifice...which was the fulfillment...

Exactly!

No, I'm in California. Plenty of ugly here too, but we have found a little corner to hold up in that is cheaper, more conservative, and more Christian. Otherwise we were doing the same thing, TX, etc.. I think it all depends on just where in TX. FL might be good.

Yeah, got that, liked it. But no, I am not offended, just laying do the plumb line.

I know that if you sincerely ask God to delivery you from it - He will...even if it takes your whole life, and it might.

Lots of things matter...your opinion, not so much.

That would suggest that the object is to "abide", even remain, in the world in a state of living like Christ. But the bigger picture of what it means to follow Christ would be incomplete at that, and rather should be complete, just as it is with Him: Born of the flesh Overcome with Him in His...

It is a fair question for anyone who would not have the slightest idea of where and when you have explained in the past. The fact that you evade the question though when asked in sincerity, is suspect.

That is a good definition. The mechanics of this issue come from a belief that centers on our worldly experience, rather than the renewing of our mind to the eternal realities of God and the kingdom. Time, is the greatest stumbling block.

Most of those accusations end with the word "spiritualizing", with the idea that it is bad to seek and to walk in the form of God Himself. They are wrong, dead wrong.

Strange... I have been accused or assumed to be Gnostic, but would agree with align with none of that. Hmmm.

I care because you have come here to lie and to attack. But you are not kidding anyone, you came to us - to pester us...not the other way around.