Search results

Thank you for expressing your thoughts. I do have a sense however, that with your question you are attempting to sell your idea, even to yourself, even though it is a question and not an answer, except that you have extrapolated it in your mind. But it is good that you have done so, that we can...

Except...and this we should well know, that the Lord Himself manifest Himself to Abraham and Sarah, and did eat and drink before He became flesh.

Of course He is God and can do anything. Are you suggesting that He might take back what He has given up according to all that is promised?

Why do you nullify your prayer with untruth - you who quote the prophets one by one, only to speak against the One who sent them one by one, tempting others to say amen? But you are wrong. I have not accused you, but simply stated what should be obvious. Did you think the words were idle when...

And again you have exposed your self.

That is a fine commentary for someone who doesn't know and is just expressing different views. But I am not dabbling in the unknown, and if I have exercised exhortation, it is only because it has been given to me to do so - not by men or by word or by interpretations, but by God. PS, As for...

That physical body He has explained as being His church - which is not at all like you have described as Him taking up the flesh. You are contradicting Him. Well...if you will not hear even Him when He has said, "It is finished", then I will not argue with you but turn you over to the flesh. But...

Just because you are blinded by your owe prejudice and have missed my comments of fairness and including them, does not mean I did not do it, as you say. You are wrong. I did, and do. Not funny at all. You complain of prejudices, but have become prejudice yourself. If you want to fix the...

This whole anti-catholic thing is completely yours. If I have spoke against you, it is against you, not the Catholics. In fact, I often include the Protestants in these threads to try to show that this infighting of yours is just as bad as anything you are intending to stand against. But you...

You are not doing the math... If Jesus went "to the Father", and now "lives in us" - He has returned already. Which means you are looking for another Jesus...that does not exist...i.e., a false Jesus. ...Let me help you with this: If you admit that Christ is "in us", how then can you say He...

I will have to watch the video later...but this is a great point that needs to be properly understood. Perhaps I will elaborate after watching the video.

That's good. You may want to change your Youtube presentations to show the body of Christ as His church, which He has long since entered into...i.e., returned to. For "it is no longer we who live, but Christ who lives in us." ...And then it would be interesting to look at the "blindness"...

...And what biblical terms would you give your name-calling and rudeness? Whatever terms you would use Love has cancelled none of it, for these are not love, which commandment you have neglected.

You might like to do that study, but it will not change the fact that in death: Ecclesiastes 12:7 Then the dust will return to the earth as it was, And the spirit will return to God who gave it.

2 Corinthians 5:8 We are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord.

That is better, but still you are mixing the resurrection (Jesus' proof of power over life and death in the world) with His ascension, which is not in the "like manner" of the world and the flesh, but in the "like manner" of God whom is [only] spirit. You see, the future of God's children is...

Folks... God is spirit...and Jesus went "to the Father"...and that is the "like manner" in which the angel of the Lord said He would return - not in the flesh, but in the spirit, which is "the glory of the Father." "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the spirit...

You are not upsetting me. You are looking in the wrong place, and I am one offering directions. You are also preaching, which being misguided, is not a service, but a disservice. But it is not just you. The time has come that many and most who believe they are serving the Lord are not, but have...

What you do you were not called to, not to reviling, but to love and compassion.

Don't back away, for it is not for that reason that women have been assigned such a roll. Where the Headship is clearly Christ, men have no headship over women within the body. The leadership rolls of men in the church are only for the sake of non-members, those outside the body. On a forum such...