Search results

Yes. Here you seem to be confused. Yes.

You assume a lot, but disregard even more. Are not the dead already dead? Are not the living (in Christ) already living, and shall be forever more? Do you deny these things of Christ? Apparently so. But if not, then you should see your mistake and change...while there is still time.

Chomping at the bit...

Who was it that claimed that the rapture would happen on the night of February 22, 1986? I wish to compliment him on his accuracy, and then ball him out for not warning me personally.

There are plenty of reasons to believe that God is true. The bible in fact, is a written record, not of what people "believe" is true, but is rather a record of actual witnesses who have had personal contact with God down through the ages of all recorded history. The record is made up of...

The entire position is not one of reason or being convinced, but of denying that Christ does not reign upon the earth even now - that all authority in heaven and earth was not given to Him 2000 years ago. So, the whole teaching of a 1000 year reign happening in the "future", is a sham. You and...

Good...and if you will draw the comparison, that discomfort may tell you something.

True.

This seems to be the bottom line idea...so perhaps I will jump in here. I would say, No. But only because you qualify the question as it pertains to "witnessing." Which is an interesting point, but I would say there is more to it. I mean, as you point out, it is so prevalent that there...

Well...it's not called glory for nothing! :) I would agree that much of the written word regarding heaven, is parable word pictures. But as one who has already experienced leaving "here" in the spirit, I have to say, it was more real than what we now experience, but similar, at least in...

No need. God speaks in tongues.

No, no, no. You don't get to call the shots on when and how God reveals His truth. I have done my part, as those who have gone before, and it is either believed or not. That is how witnessing works.

That could be the problem.

BB, you are not listening. I told you that "My witness...is the second witness." Thus, if you have missed the first witness, you have some catching up to do. But I have no need to produce witnesses that came before. But, hey, I just happened upon this article, which I have not fully read, but...

I was referring to what I had just posted in explanation - it's enough. I have explained. I have countered your arguments. I have quoted scripture. I have explained that my witness is the second witness, that you should not expect another. I have declared my authority to do so. And it is enough.

If you or the pope want to second guess Jesus or the providence of God over His word, because you think you know the need better than He does...go for it, I am sure you will be rewarded accordingly.

Thanks! She's a professional, a national award winner.

I should not even answer you - you are in need of milk, and recklessly take on what you know very little about. The words are not enough, the scriptures must be discerned spiritually. There is only One Truth (gospel), not three. As for being saved by believing this or that, it is rather "by...

No, you are under the wrong impression. Even Jesus quoted very little compared with all He said that was perceived as new but was not. So, again, I appeal rather to your reason and to your own interpretation: Tell me that all that is written does not point to Christ, and that all of time is not...

I have quoted all these to you, which you should have yielded to with just one: "Today." But if you will not hear it, it is because you cannot.