Search results

You assume I have no answer and that you are right, but you error. God can and does use donkeys and event stones to declare Himself and his will. But woe to you for calling what He has raised up by His providence, satanic.

You tempt the Lord God and show your own fear in one post, appearing to be an angel of light. But your time is limited. He who has an ear, let him hear.

You taking the credit for your misguided beliefs, doesn't make it right or correct. The scriptures may be touched and even penned by men, but their only qualification is that God saw fit to use them in spite of themselves. The scriptures and how they are passed down from generation to generation...

I have already answered...and it is you who plays a game. I will not be tempted. Satan, get behind me!

That is not why Christ said that. But rather, because "My sheep hear my voice." But the point is, you, nor the Catholic church have heard His voice - because you reject His word on how He is building His church by the spirit of the One who sent Him. To your own shame, you have instead heard...

They are not God. Not to worry, none of that is going to happen.

What natural phenomena?

Nonetheless, He fulfilled - all.

No...and to say so is a denial of "Christ in us." Which [again] is Antichrist.

You kid yourself. "Vicar" is a word used by the Catholics for [as you say] "the head" of the church. You use scriptures when they are convenient, but cannot reconcile them all: "Christ is the head of the church." So, to say that Christ is still the head after taking that role upon yourselves...

Jesus fulfilled all: "It is finished." However, that statement is mostly confused. Most believe because they themselves have not seen the finish, that Christ obviously meant it differently than he said it - that perhaps his "earthly " ministry was finished, but surely "all" is not...

Before going further. Since you are not understanding me, I will explain: When I said, "I am not reading the words." It is because we do not "read" in spirit, but "hear" and "see." But you, if you only read and do not hear or see, then we will not agree. And this much is apparent.

If we have been raised up with Christ, then we are above Satan and his demons in authority, and are fine and right to be forthright. But having been lost in times past ourselves, it is not right that we should show arrogance to the lost, but rather compassion. And to God and to our brothers and...

According to the same word, I rebuke a brother who puffs himself up, and those who raise up men in place of Christ (except in marriage). But you, you more than "double" the honor, counting a man, not as worthy of double, but as worthy of all, even as the Head.

And that is the problem: A leader or elder in the church, is never more than a fellow servant and a brother. But you have taken it too far.

I asserted no such thing - you simply misunderstand [again]. And...it is not okay to counter one scripture against another. I quoted Jesus saying that his word "is spirit." My only assertion was that that is why we do not agree...because you are looking at the scriptures in word only, and not...

If I quote the scriptures without giving an opinion, and you call me "wrong"...I shall count it good, and be glad that you do not want to engage me in conversation.

What's that got to do with Christ not building a corruptible temple?

Apparently not. You are reading the words, and I am not. But the words are spirit, and do not speak of glorifying the flesh, but of redeeming us from it.

Well, good, I am glad you have a clear understanding, and will now stop exalting those who exalt themselves - just as you pointed out: Jesus was speaking about the Scribes and Pharisees who exalted themselves before all: “They love places of honor at banquets, seats of honor in synagogues...