Search results

You just agreed with what I said. This is a thread about OSAS - which is an invention of Protestantism. The Bible neither preaches this fallacy nor supports it.

Okay - let's break down your moronic, anti-Biblical attacks on Christ's Church . . . 1. Scripture alone?? WHERE does the bible say this? 2 Timothy 3:16-17 tells us that all Scripture is PROFITABLE (useful) for teaching, doctrine, reproof, etc. NOWHERE does it say it is our Sole Authority...

Then, why do YOU hold to the Tradition of the Canon of Scripture?? This is a CATHOLIC Tradition. The Catholic Church, guided by the Holy Spirit declared the Canon of Scripture. Can you explain this??

And anti-Catholics like yourself need to be reminded of TWO things as well (at least). 1. There is no such Church as "The Roman Catholic Church." 2. There is PLENTY of blood on the hands of Protestantism as well. Your hypocrisy will get you NOWHERE . . .

And, as humans - our desires and passions fail us every time. We STRIVE to be obedient, but we stumble - and some of us fall away. Yes, the Bible tells us that we CAN lose our salvation - and warns us of the consequences . . . Romans 11:22 “See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity...

And a "gift" can be rejected - even AFTER receiving it. The Scriptures NEVER indicate that a believer can "never fully" walk away from God. Being "sealed" has conditions - the condition that we endure in faith (Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1...

The Gospel IS simple when you take one verse and absolutize it as the only requirement for salvation. Unfortunately, Scripture doesn't stop there. We must endure in faith - and having enduring faith is NOT an easy thing and required MUCH more than simply "believing" and "confessing" . . . -...

Pagan Rome fell largely BECAUSE of the Christian Church. It didn't "morph" into it. When you use idiotic, sweeping generalizations like "ALL students of history affirm" - it simply shows that you have once again failed to do your homework . . .

Precisely. Anti-Catholics like yourself have a ridiculous double-standard when it comes to the definition of "idolatry". Catholics aren't allowed to respect our Church leaders while following the Gospel - yet YOU guys not only revere your leaders - you disobey the Gospel message with your...

Gee, Einstein - I wonder what he meant by "Roman State" and "Roman Empire". This was LONG before the Catholic Church was legalized in Rome and was STILL under persecution. The "Roman State" and "Roman Empire" meant just that - PAGAN ROME and NOT the Church. What an exhausting feat is must be...

And apparently, YOU don't see the complete contradiction of your statements. You applaud Tyndale for holding Scripture "above" Sacred Traditions - yet Scripture itself puts Sacred Tradition ON PAR with Scripture. In other words, Einstein - you just contradicted the very Scripture YOU hold to...

You should ALWAYS care about being proven wrong in public. The Roman Empire and Christ's Church are two completely different and separate entities. One is a pagan government - and the other is the Body of Christ - of which He said the gates of Hell would never prevail against. Like I said...

And your "facts" are quite skewed - if not mostly fictional. A little advice: Don't get your "facts" from opinion sites like the Huffington Post . . . A little information about William Tyndale . . . He wasn't condemned merely for translating the Bible. He was condemned for MISTRANSLATING it...

Yes, I know you keep pasting this moronic manure in multiple threads but, as I already destroyed your position on another thread - I may as well do it here, too . . . These were not prohibitions on the READING or even ownership of Bibles. They were directed against the perverse interpretations...

In other words - you're not going to let yourself get "side-tracked" by the TRUTH. You keep throwing around terms like "RCC" and "Roman Catholic Church" yet you have NO idea what that means. Allow me to educate you . . . First if all - there is NO entity known as "The Roman Catholic Church" or...

Re-posting the same fictional nonsense. I see you haven't learned you lesson here. History is MUCH more than a couple of out-of-context remarks. It takes some actual research . . .

I was going to respond to this moronic thread - but it is already being well-policed by my non-Catholic friends here. This kind of ridiculous nonsense is the kind of drivel that has caused so much division within the Body of Christ over the centuries - especially when so much of it is pure...

Thank you for posting the above, out-of-context excerpts. These were not prohibitions on the READING or even ownership of Bibles. They were directed against the perverse interpretations and spurious copies that were being produced. There were MANY bad and even heretical translations...

REALLY?? Can you show me some actual historical proof - or are you just content to spew the same moronic lies that you've been spoon fed your whole life? The Church never forbade the reading the Scripture. the historical facts are this: - As many as 85% of the general population was...

First of all, my dishonest friend - I'm not sure where you get the idea that Pope Eusebius was an Arian heretic. He is a canonized Saint in the Church. He wasn't "excommunicated" by any council. He was eventually exiled to Sicily by the Roman emperor Maxentius in 306. He died there in 310...