Search results

Excerpt from Has Global Warming Paused? - Scientific American average surface temperatures worldwide have not increased since around the turn of the century. I know the article is a bit dated but I was keenly aware that none of the alarmists predicted a pause global warming. This tells you it...

Fixed it for you. The arrogance of the proposition is seen in the fact that human beings cannot control global temperatures. All we can control is emissions. Regarding the horrors of burning fossil fuels, it's like you have no economic consideration at all. Regarding "we," if political...

What does it tell you that there is no 'godhead' in Scripture (although I admit bad trinitarian English translations insert the flawed word, such as those translations with 'James' in the title)? God is referred to using singular pronouns 20,000 times in Scripture.

Lots of people say I am. Does that make them God also? If not, why not?

True. If someone asked me what verse says man was created in 6 day, both of us could specify a verse. If we were pressed to identify the verse that specifies what day Eve was created on, we ought to humbly admit there is no specific verse for that.

My point stands. He asked you for a verse. You told him to go figure it out (that you narrowed the search to 1 chapter changes nothing.) These are the games trinitarians must resort to. They cannot see the disconnect between any actual verse in Scripture to their dogma.

We Protestants ARE talking about salvation! You are stuck on the word justification AS IF it is the basis of salvation. Let me put it this way, do Catholics believe one can obtain salvation without works? Yes or No will suffice.

Sorry but you are demonstrating how hard it is for Protestants to talk to Catholics. It’s like there are 2 conversations, talking over each other. What you so adamantly assert is completely untrue! I’m confidant @Ferris Bueller is talking about salvation. James 2:24 is NOT in conflict with the...

I no longer tolerate such transparent rationalizations, substituting “oneness” for alone being one. It’s ridiculous on its face in any language. And it is insulting to the ancient Hebrew monotheists who reject the trinity to this day, implying they don’t understand their own sacred texts.

Typical. Appeal to Superman. You figure it out. You figure out how I am right! What a response. What a compelling argument.

You do know that plural does not only mean 3, right? Gnosticism on display. And your scripture verse does not support Gnosticism. One is a technical term? Pul-ease.

Jesus is a man who has a God. Jesus’ God is the only God.

Language usage. What is the name of Peter Paul and Mary! What is the name of the Pittsburg Steelers.

I noticed people pray FOR the HS, not to the HS.

You think that EVE THOUGH Jesus taught us to pray to God, our Father (and not to him or a trinity)?

As I understand trinitarianism, it is not understanding it but believing it that is a condition of being saved. Do you hold that one must believe in the trinity to be saved?

It's a good point but I'm not sure it changes the math on redemption. I mean Scripture says one made brought sin, another man brought salvation, right? Scripture emphasizes 2 points; they were men and the unity of what was redeemed, 1:1. Maybe you are relying on another verse?

In this bottle dwells the fullness of a smooth 10 year old whiskey. That does not make me whiskey. So, you are right. Still no verse that says The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe...

Not an honest inquiry indeed!

Outstanding point! I never heard it put that way before.