Search results

What I gave many verses. Are you denying these verses because I did not include the book-chapter-# of verse?

The Bible is a unitarian text. ALL the words fit that. ‘For us, there is one God, the Father.’ 1 Cor 8:6

Not “he” but that, that word as in John 6:60. But I see you have just ignored the verses cited that destroy the trinity. You will not be convinced - even by Gods word.

OMG! Your error is to disregard the singular pronoun, ‘me.’ The trinity is a blatant violation of this loyalty to a unitarian, singular (not 3 in 1) God.

Which begs the question of why you enter threads like this? How do you reconcile that with John 4:23-24, where Jesus says true worshippers worship the Father?

Indeed, Jesus said his father is greater than him and that his father is the only true God.

John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the entire Bible. What John clearly say in 20:31 is that everything he wrote was to prove something else than what you are using his words to prove. This means that nothing John wrote can be used to prove what you say John clearly and unmistakably said.

I love how trinitarians attempt to get around this by parsing synonyms. One being is one person. Begotten means to be created.

No. There is no doctrinal purity test for salvation. Sanctification, different story. There be the divisiveness.

If you are not defending church bashing, my mistake. My apologies.

It’s not God’s word that is subject to change but our improved understanding of it.

I recall a couple of decades ago when several prominent pastors fell from grace in short order, e.g, Baker, Falwell, Catholic priests, et Al. It was their personal, moral behavior that got them in trouble, not their doctrine. Also, I’d like to propose that holding accountable and rebuking...

Great! What are you talking about then?

And you equate this with Church bashing?

IF. I invoke the word to reinforce the pathway to destruction of the 1st sinner, Satan. His sin was pride, leading to a God complex. Who the hell did Satan think he is? God. This led to his separation from God. Some say that is what hell is. What do you say?

There is no doctrinal purity test to be saved. That should tell you something. I'm sure you agree there is a difference between merely judging something and engaging in Church Bashing, which is what this thread is about. Judging doctrine is not what this thread is about. There are 30,000...

It is not his place to judge other believers and certainly not to bash churches under any pretext. That is his trespass. It gives Christians a bad name. Who the hell does he think he is?

I said nothing of the kind. The proper way to read God's Word is with God's Spirit. Translations are not pure. Odd for you to invoke Strawman and to suppose that means I am claiming something blasphemous about God. The KJV is now the worst translation available in English. The best translation...

It's irrelevant to the OP. Worse, you are taking something that is unconditional and attempting to make it conditional.

Your bias is obvious. AS IF there is something wrong with making a living and serving God. :rolleyes: Sir, this reveals your God complex. Only God knows their heart. As another poster pointed out, have you ever read the introduction of these modern translations? They do a fair job of...