Search results

Q. Can souls die? A. Yes. For some reason, you are contentious and divisive on this. Maybe it's because the answer is not what you want to hear. Rather than admit this in a mature way, you pretend answers were not provided, skipping over the answer and being obtuse with the explanation of...

catechumens? Is that your word of the day? Catechumens | Definition of Catechumens by Merriam-Webster Definition of catechumen 1: a convert to Christianity receiving training in doctrine and discipline before baptism 2: one receiving instruction in the basic doctrines of Christianity before...

Do you hear yourself? Not only does what you wrote make no sense, it really does not address my point. If I read into what you wrote, it appears that your mind cannot differentiate a collection of saints, believers in Jesus with the RCC.

Not the RCC as it is currently constituted but yes. You are confusing the collection of those who believe Jesus is the Messiah, the son of God and their personal lord and savior with a corrupt institution founded by councils of men 11 centuries after Jesus was crucified.

I get the impression you want to be spoon fed. Friend, I gave you answers. I’m not going to explain the answers. You can research more on your own time and pray and meditate on them: definition and elemental composition of 'star dust"; What exactly does applying soul mean, etc. You are...

The planets are made from dust, specifically star dust. Not sure what you are asking ‘where is this at.’ My pastor gave that definition of soul. In application, it works. It is said when a ship sinks that all souls perished. Soul cannot be separated from life in the body. Also, not sure if you...

Can the soul die? SOUL = BODY + SPIRIT. The Spirit is from God and returns when apart from the body. The body is made of star dust and most certainly can die. So, therefore, the soul can certainly die. We do not yet have an immortal soul, in a glorified body, but that happens on Judgment Day...

The harlot, the whore of Babylon, Ishtar, is the Statue of Liberty, which represents the United States of America. The UN World Headquarters is here. The false prophet violates God's word at Proverbs 22:28, Do not move an ancient boundary stone set up by your ancestors via the end of national...

Where are the Catholics defending this abomination?

By what authority do you presume to speak for the brethren, "we?" You make claims without evidence, desperately stretching those who walked with Jesus and endowed with miraculous power as a term to apply to corrupt men in councils.

Does it matter? You equate someone saying "Oh my God" with Jesus saying his father is the one true God. 16 Bethsabee bowed herself, and worshipped the king. And the king said to her: What is thy will? 1 Kings 1:16 (Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition)

David was called God and also did not correct him. That Jesus did not correct him supports the obvious context that what was spoken was an exclamatory statement. I've surprised people and they exclaim 'Oh my God!' but I deny that I've been remiss in not correcting them. It's obvious they do not...

What proof would you accept? The corrupt Catholic Church did not exist when the Scriptures were written. So, it's not going to say a corrupt man-made institution 11 centuries hence is not your authority but my word is the authority on Scriptural matters, right?

So Thomas is the authority on who the one true God is and not Jesus, huh? I'll take Jesus words over yours or anyone else's. Thanks.

Strawman after Strawman. This is what I said Sola Scriptura is. You cannot address the actual valid position of Protestants, which is why you invoke one Strawman argument after another.

Such is the power of the trinitarian delusion that if one does not accept the heresy, one cannot even accept Jesus as one's master (lord) and Savior while recognizing he is not his father who alone is the LORD God almighty who raised Jesus, his servant from the dead.

Friend, the evidence is steering you in the face. Only vain thing is denying it is a non-vain exclamatory statement but a non-declarative statement. Said differently, it is vain to impose trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text, which every single author of the Bible was a monotheist Jew...

Other translations read differently. In any event it is an exclamatory statement not a declarative statement. When I drop my toast, I am not declaring that the toast is literally feces, when I exclaim "Oh crap."

Another verse not in the Bible (until corrupted). Nevertheless, it is still not the doctrine of the trinity as much as trinitarians wish it was. They were not able to convince themselves to corrupt Scripture enough to actually put the trinity in the Bible explicitly.

This is the primary deception of the corrupt Catholic Church; to assert the rock is the man rather than his confession. His confession is the confession of all Christians; that Jesus is the Messiah, Son of God, the Savior of the world and our Lord, which means we owe fidelity to him - not a...