Search results

Thank you. Logic. Being the son of God, necessarily means one is not God. Excellent use of Scripture and logic.

All prophets speak the word of God. This does not make this God. Oh, so sorry. This thread is about who appealed to God on the cross. What is your answer?

It's sad that you keep invoking John 1:1 when you know John 20:31 says everything he wrote was to prove something else.

The trinity is not in the Bible. Not sure how you come to the conclusion of the fact of Jesus' divinity but I remind you that Jesus died. And before that, he talked about his God. How does your flesh - and Spirit - accept that fact?

Good take-away. Revelations is a notoriously figurative book. I appreciate those who can decipher meaning from it.

Amicus Plato. Amicus Aristotle sed magis amica veritas. Newton “Plato is my friend, Aristotle is my friend, but my greatest friend is truth.”

It's such a great point and stunning contrast. On the one hand, they claim to be the ultimate moral authority on Earth. On the other hand, pedophilia is epidemic. Only unbridled arrogance can achieve such contrast.

You are deeply and profoundly confused. Even when presented with the actual definition, you confound the matter. Bless your heart! I’ll continue to pray for you.

It shows how desperate Trinitarians are to continue to invoke a passage having nothing to do with the subject of the thread, Jesus or the Book of Acts. Did you ever watch the vid I posted dozens of times on John's prologue?

Not in keeping with the Rules for Christian Living. Love each other as brothers and sisters and honor others more than you do yourself. Romans 12:10 (CEV)

Agreed. Our twisted friend went so far as to say Sola Scriptura is unscriptural. He's a lost soul and I pray for him frequently.

Definition 2 has nothing to do with baptism. Definition 1 has nothing to do with church membership. And you conveniently ignored how you are not living up to Romans 12:10 with your relentless diatribe against those who reject the corrupt RCC.

A member of A church, not ‘the one and only true church.’ How you are connecting baptism to church membership is a mystery.

That is NOT what the definition 2 says.

I was wondering the same thing about you. You are not answering questions. But you are being argumentative and insulting. This tells me what you won’t admit; it’s not about your failure to understand WHAT, the explanation. You don’t like the answer, which is souls can die.

Not sure. And I'm not sure how this is mystical or magical to you. Also, I have no idea how you draw 3 = 1 from that sentence. If Jesus said baptize in the name of Moe, Larry and Curly, would that be mystical or magical to you?

Willful denial. I've given the direct answer multiple times. Yes, souls can die. I'm not explaining why this is the answer more than I already have. Look up petulance while you are at it.

I accept your answer but have no idea how the KJV verses you cited comes in to play. Make a great day!

There is a kind of supreme arrogance and childishness in your posts. You aren't getting what you asked for but what you need. You just don't like what you need! LOL. Since the internet came out decades ago I took the position that I am not going to define words for people. If you are too lazy...

I was motivated to start this thread from another where a poster wrote about baptism as though it were some kind of mystic or magical thing. For the record, I reject mysticism and magic but to realize that with heavenly beings, we deal with supernatural powers. Do Catholics think there is some...