Search results

Why would Jesus say he was going to his God in John 20:17? To give Trinitarian’s reason to employ dualism. Why does Saint Luke annex say that God raised & selected Jesus? To give Trinitarian’s reason to employ dualism.

LOL. You are the one with the problem; not willing to admit that if I show you the verse, will it convince you Jesus is not God.

Singular pronoun does not refer to 3. God is referred to over 10,000 times in the Bible using singular pronouns. For, instance, the 1C says not to have any gods before me. Only one indoctrinated with trinitarianism could suppose this refers to a 3-being person.

I'm untwisting trinitarians gymnastic take Scripture. You cannot even concede the entire Bible is written by monotheist Jews who reject the trinity to this day. Obviously, you have to deny that because it would require you consider verses in the unitarian light they were written in.

No. I did not skip it. Lap #201.

You don't seem to acknowledge any verses that undermine the trinity. Rather than concede the point, you just jump to something else. For instance, you never answered my simple question of whether or not Jesus died. I added that God is eternal and unchanging. So, if you concede Jesus died, you...

I won't. Your desperate attempt to shift attention to other verses not in the OP is noted.

Yes to the first. No, Jesus is the first born to the 2nd. You know that.

For some reason, trinitarians do not realize how scripture goes against their doctrine. Anything that 'is the image of' or 'in the form of' something is NOT that thing, including God. Logic Definition Language Usage Mirrors reflect what is the image of whoever is in front of it. That does not...

Sorry but I do not believe you since this thread already provided such Scripture in the OP and you are not answering my basic question once the Scripture is provided. Are you seriously saying you never read in Scripture that Jesus was the first born of all creation? That you cannot research...

This is just another example of completely absurd reasoning. The historical narrative is not supposed to be evidentiary. For instance, the Jews who condemned him of blasphemy not only realized he was not God incarnate but not even the Messiah. So, that is definitive proof using your standard.

No response is what about it. Given that Jesus is the first born of all creation, it means he is not God for he is not the Father.

This is what you do. You do not concede anything but jump from one thing to another AS IF always being on the attacks makes your doctrine valid. Please stick to the verses in the OP. Thanks.

If I provide the Scripture that states Jesus is the 1st born of all creation, will you concede that he is not God? If not, then your reply is just a smoke screen, right?

No. I’m comparing one claim of divinity to an exclamation to mock how ridiculous your desperate rationalization is to support your doctrine. The only God is Jesus’ God, the one he said he was going to in John 20:17, the one Jesus said was the one true God in John 17.

I see it the same way. However, on the radio, they used the WWJD standard. One caller said the question is fear based. And as a Jesus follower, we should address that heart of the matter. We must pray for discernment in why the person is asking the question.

Lap 200. No response to the Scripture that says Jesus is the 1st born of all creation. Predictable.

Yes, we are partakers of the divine nature, along with Jesus. Does not make us God - or him.

Not a conversation if you just ignore that dualism is not in the provided texts.

Dualism. Scripture says over and over and over again he was a man. This is his one nature. And what makes the resurrection significant. It is not Jesus' divinity but the divinity of God whose Spirit was in him and us.