Search results

1st, this thread is about John 1. 2nd, it is a rock solid argument when looking at the totality of Scripture, which does not one time mention the trinity or the divinity of Jesus. Not one time! Sure, all kinds of ambiguous statements, like John 1:1 are desperately reached for but fail basic...

Again, systemic racism favoring Blacks. See college admissions. See BET. See Black Caucus in Congress See NAACP. Can you imagine if there were a National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People?!

Yes but not due to racism but behavior. The violent crime rate is not equal across all demographic groups. It's not equality but equity. Earned. Deserved. What Blacks ought to do is have a competition with Asians to study more and commit fewer violent crimes.

I know. Just wanted to show the consistently of John to the rest of Scripture. The resurrected Jesus first words were to talk of his God. Jesus' God is the only God.

Trinitarians have to abandon logic, definition and language usage at every turn to support their doctrine. The VOICE translation does not use the word "Christ" which translates into Anointed. Who Anoints in the Bible? God. Jesus very title is Anointed by God. His very title tells you he is not...

The Father = God. This is stated in every epistle. Not once is God, the Holy Spirit, mentioned. Not once is God, the Son, mentioned. The obvious reason is this is not what the Bible writers believed. And he will call out to me, ‘You are my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’ Psalm...

While trinitarians obsessively rely on the figurative John 1:1, they ignore the rest of the Gospel of John provides some of the most explicitly damning evidence against trinitarianism in all of Scripture. From my devotional reading the other day, we learn Jesus admits he is a man who heard from...

I've posted this numerous times. Doubt trinitarians watch it. (2601) John's Prologue - Part 1 - YouTube

Yea, in favor of Black people. See college admission standards.

I like the NLT also, along with CEV & VOICE and sometimes ESV. No one translation always impacts me the most. If you read through Why The Apostles Repeatedly Disobeyed the Risen Lord you'll see a bizarre rationalization that when the Apostles only baptized in no name or the name of Jesus, it...

It's Cultural Marxism, advancing communism along identity politics. It has to invent an oppressor group and and oppressed group. Black/White & Men/Women are but 2 'intersectionalities.'

Cannot grasp figurative language, huh? The literal name of the son of God is not Immanuel. Indeed, God is with us, through the man Jesus. There is one God and one Mediator who can reconcile God and humanity—the man Christ Jesus. 1 Timothy 2:5

Hmmm. Certainly the NSRV translates the verses that way. You seem to disregard the 'from the LORD' part of the verses, even in your preferred NKJV, is that accurate? Regarding the limits of God being good; I imagine people on the receiving end of God's wrath and justice equate it with evil...

I've been told this for decades. Trinitarians confuse <not understanding> with <rejecting as invalid>, e.g., flat Earth.

If I did, I'd be the biggest hypocrite in the world! I love fiction involving super powers and magic. As a kid, I loved Superman. Then Star Wars came out with 'the Force.' Green Lantern, Harry Potter & Marvel Comics all obsess over magic stones. Human powers are relegated to not super powers...

The trinity is nonsense (like square circles), inherently contradictory, goes against Scripture, logic, definition and language usage. Well, we are many things. You stop counting at a 1 = 3 convenience. 1 = 1; 1 <> 3. A is A. Apples are not <Apples and Oranges>. There is nothing hard here.

Hmmm. In the book When Jesus Became God, the author Rubenstein details how politically motivated even compiling Scripture was. For instance, there is very credible evidence that Matthew 28:19 was not in the original manuscripts but was a 4th century trinitarian corruption. Have you ever looked...

I agree with that. Don't you see though that in Daniel, he was talking about himself but in 1 Samuel, it is a proper noun, a Spirit and most significantly, from the LORD? Another words, it is one thing for Saul to despair, for his spirit to be penitent for disobeying God. It is another thing for...

Scripture does fit together seamlessly - once you jettison the trinity, stop imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text.

LOL That's what everyone does.