Search results

I've explained it dozens of times AND provided a video. If you want to pretend John 1:1 supersedes the Sh'ma and the 1,000's of times God is identified as singular pronouns, bless your heart.

Of time before the 2nd Coming. I believe we are in the last decade.

Those who do not differentiate between an explicit teaching from ‘support’ of doctrine already held do not care how weak the ‘support’ is.

Virgin or young women?

Which ends when? I was estimating September 2027.

What is more likely: A. The largest church in America is false; or B. Some pastors are jealous of Osteen’s amazing success? That could be accurate. Osteen hinself said he likes to focus on the positive. My church has decided to not focus on sin on the congregation, calling it Gods job to...

You know Is 9:6 is referring to someone around the time of Isaiah and not the Messiah, right?

What Scriptural passage is that?

Words are not beings. That is how you know John 1:1 is figurative. It's absurd to say the word of Joe Biden is Joe Biden. Anyway, as another person pointed out proof text against the trinity abounds in John 17:22.

I did not want to turn to Scripture so soon but came across these verses that indicate Biblical times was an evidence based culture compared to today's emphasis on believing without evidence, which goes against the intelligentsia. This, the first of Yeshua’s miraculous signs, he did at Kanah...

You are projecting.

5 posts before somebody smeared a man of God.

Surrender to God. Let’s his grace displace any negativity.

You truly do not get it! To cobble together a doctrine from various passages is what it means to NOT be an explicit teaching. By contrast, that Jesus is the Son of God, the Messiah, is explicit. You can find it explicitly in a single verse. Please keep in mind this thread is not meant to...

Yes because the man is God thesis is not in Scripture. The reliance on duality is clear when one considers Jesus said he was sent. Who has authority to send God on a mission? The answer is laughable as it distorts language, such as a bring sends themselves on a mission.

I understand your position as absent from Scripture as an explicit teaching suit is. I’m sure we’d agree on the explicit teaching in the Bible like we need to have faith in Jesus to take away our sins, that we should forgive others as our subs are forgiven and as Jesus said, most importantly...

Hebrews 4:12 come to mind. That we might be guided by the Spirit to understand God's word differently and that explains, in part, the proliferation of denominations. There is a quote from St Augustine on this I'll dig up later when I have time.

That is a great point. Sola Scriptura is a latin phrase. So, one should not expect to see it in Hebrew or Greek text, right? Having said that, I think this is supportive. How about you? And so you cancel the word of God in order to hand down your own tradition. Mark 7:13 (NLT)

Great question! I like to differentiate between reasonable degrees of confidence. For instance, compare and contrast what various Christian denominations hold in common compared to their doctrinal differences. My guess is what is in common is more likely explicitly taught. Now, there is nothing...