Search results

You ask as a total diversion to the MANY examples I provided of inequality.

We are not talking about sanctification. Changing the term of the discussion from OSAS to Justification shows that you have lost the argument. Gifts must be accepted and received. This constitutes action on our part. The contradiction of OSAS is revealed. That is why I differentiate between...

I speak English. I am Groot.

First, let me reference a 21st century translation. From the VOICE Are you so foolish? Do you think you can perfect something God’s Spirit started with any human effort? Notice the starting and perfecting aspect to the question? No one is saying anything going against Galatians 3:3. No one is...

Not this crap again. The Word is the word of God (not Jesus). See Deuteronomy 18:15-18. Noticed you just ignore the inequality. Except for all the exceptions, there are no exceptions.

Calling it Option C (then not defining it) does not make it so. You cannot answer the question of sinning ones way to heaven. HINT: Repenting is an action needed on your part. There is no "once saved always saved" in the Bible. There is "Work out your own salvation" in the Bible. You receive...

LOL. Pathetic. This is a quote from David. David is saying to God that his thrown is forever, which it is.

You STILL have not answered the question. The answer is A or B. A. One can sin their way to heaven. B. Unrepentant sinners cannot go to heaven.

You can project your own quoting Scripture and misapplied it for the purpose of theology all you want. Fact is, 100% co-equal co-essential and co-eternal is no where to be found in Scripture. The trinity is not in the Bible.

It is no mystery. Christ is the son of God, which means by definition, he is not God.

Never said it was. OSAS forever appeal to straw man in their arguments and assertions. You never answered the question 07-07-07 asked; do you think you can sin your way to heaven?

Getting. Keeping. Not equal. You are not saved by works. But you can lose flavor. Matthew 7:21 says there is a condition to those who go to heaven. That condition is work, actually doing the will of the Father.

It is my characterization. You explained and I agreed to your use of the terms trusting and turning. If these actions were not prerequisites then universalism is correct doctrine, since it is the will of the Father than we be saved. The Bible foolishly says all who BELIEVE will be saved? Why is...

This is the most absurd thing I ever heard. The Father begat Jesus. Jesus died. God raised Jesus from the dead. Jesus was sent, did the will, spoke the words of God, needed to be strengthened by angels and prophets and asked God to take the Cup. Jesus submitted to the will of the Father. In...

Yes, a whole lot of us going to the flames. But I already explained dozens of times what is meant by internal work, slay the biggest idol in the world, your own ego. No one can truly believe in God when they think themselves god. That is the story of the Bible beginning with the Garden.

I noticed he did not answer this.

Yes, the wheat from the chaff, those who faithfully act from merely pay life service belief. You are in denial if you suppose that is the will of the Father apart from obedience to him. Sin is not <not being saved> but actions contrary to God's will.

The difference is NOW compared to LATER. Jesus throws us a life preserver. We always have the ability to let it go.

As used in the Bible, yes. External. As used in our society, internal work, no.

LOL. That’s the internal work I’m talking about. OSAS cannot even use language properly to articulate their false doctrine. Trusting and turning are pre-requisite actions we must take.