Search results

And no one in this thread is saying this. The point is OSAS is not in the Bible. Jesus talks about salt losing flavor and vines that don’t produce fruit being put in the fire. I trust you connect being put I the fire with not being saved.

This also has been covered many times in this thread. We are not saved by external 'works' as that term is used in the Bible. A pre-requisite to being saved is doing internal work, slaying the biggest idol in the world, one's own ego. By their fruit, you shall know them. In other words, works...

That precise question has been answered several 100 x in this thread. We are not in the position of authority to judge. It certainly is not about 'looks' - but actual obedience to the Will of the Father, transformed action, that matters. Everything else is lip service. We are saved by the Grace...

Proof text. Good description

All oppose trinitarianism to the end: Logic. Definition. Language Usage.

This is were trinitarians abandon: Logic Definition Language Usage The Son of X is not X. Hunter is not Joe Biden. Absurd to suppose a man father's himself.

Great point! I did not have that in my collection. Thanks!

Great thread topic. I like what Jesus says on the topic. What I love about Jesus' words is that it not about feelings or paying lip service to action less belief. Only those who act (in following Jesus) are Christians. 24 Then Jesus said to his disciples: If any of you want to be my followers...

Your words are nonsense in the face of Scripture that was provided to you by justbyfaith @ Romans 11:20-22: Yes, but remember—those branches were broken off because they didn’t believe in Christ, and you are there because you do believe. So don’t think highly of yourself, but fear what could...

So, Judgment Day is fictitious?

Everything. It means everything. Not sure what ‘works’ were required for the thief on the cross.

I don't think he thief at the cross had the opportunity to fail to do the will of God after he called out to Jesus to be saved. Laps on the same subject. Yes, past tense, saved, not future tense. You cannot even use language correctly for doing so reveals the fallacy of your doctrine. We are...

And I've tried to tell you that is a great topic for another thread. I watched a great video series on marriage by a Pastor. One video was about the responsibilities women have in marriage. Another video was about the responsibilities men have in marriage. In that video the Pastor pointed out...

Then, respectfully, I submit you are posting in the wrong thread. This thread is a reaction to the institutional hatred for the male gender. I am defending only because masculinity, males, men and boys are under attack.

You are probably wrong if you did not post Scriptures highlighting the masculinity of Jesus. Did you ask Amazed@grace why she is so accusatory?

I've explained several times. Obviously, my explanation is not satisfactory to you. 2 x 2 matrix. Good (Apples & Oranges) v Bad (Apples & Oranges). Columns are Good & Bad. Rows are Apples & Oranges. What don't you understand? Feminists tend to want to only talk about the diagonal, Bad Apples...

Not the subject of this thread. Maybe. Maybe not. Here is the passive aggressiveness I've been dealing throughout this thread ... If you are not agreeing then what ARE YOU DOING with the below of boys being shamed and having to apologize for being boys?

What reason to be 'so accusatory' is acceptable to you? (I deny being 'so accusatory.' Just responding to various fallacies in this thread rather than follow the question of the OP, post Scripture highlighting the masculine Jesus). @Amazed@grace even condemned my use of a single word...

It is so and I am grateful you can express sorrow for this state of the world.

Well, it is a matter of faith that means action now, OBEDIENCE. It is not a matter of feeling that your feelings (trust) entitle you to salvation. Otherwise, Matthew 7:21 & John 15:1-2 would not be said by our Lord. To suppose being fruitful is of no practical concern is a meaningless faith.