Search results

KJV <> Word of God KJV translators got some things wrong.

OMG! You are getting increasingly desperate. Click here to understand how Matthew 28:19 is likely a corruption. Beyond that, if you read the text you will discover it does not even speak of the nature of God (let alone, if you do not believe this nature of God, you cannot be saved). If Jesus...

Sir, one way you know you are wrong is the Jewish people do not prophecy 2 comings of the Messiah. On top of that, if you are relying on Zechariah 9:9-10 as prophesying 2 Comings, I do not see it any predication of a 2nd Coming. (I thought you were relying on NT verses). 9 Cry out with joy...

The verses trinitarians distort by supposing it must support trinitarians, such as John 1:1. (But after learning more, one realizes these verses do not support trinitarianism) Right. Saying something 'differently' is not the same as not saying ANYTHING LIKE There is one God, who is trinitarian...

I've thoroughly read the Bible. The trinity is not in the Bible. Supposing the Gospel = trinitarian doctrine is ridiculous. You seem to ignore the fact that trinitarian doctrine came about 4 centuries after Jesus walked the Earth.

If the trinity were in the Bible, you would have been able to present the verse that states the trinitarian doctrine. In lieu of that, you present species verses that only by imposing trinitarian doctrine onto it does it seem to support your position but falls under the slightest scrutiny. For...

Did you not read the link that debunked the trinitarian claim that Isaiah 9:6 is a prophecy of Jesus? The other point that I've made repeatedly is how the man-is-God thesis is so strong, you do not even realize that Isaiah 9:6 does not even mention the HS and therefore, cannot be used to...

This reflects poor reading comprehension. The Word of God demonstrates Jesus literally came (and disappeared) numerous times. To be correct, the 2nd Coming, therefore, must be figurative.

The trinity is NOT in the Bible. "I am" is not a claim of divinity. Desperate reach - and sad attempt at intimidation. This is the beginning of the good news of Jesus, the Anointed One, the Liberating King, the Son of God. Mark 1:1

I noticed the trinitarian trolls did not respond to this excellent post.

Criticize all you want. My point is any legitimate criticism is based on his speculation not on his actual theology. Well, I reject the notion of acting only on 'need.' In short, I am an ally to jaybird. It is OK if he makes points beyond what is 'needed.' That you actually reference 1...

There are numerous verses about Satan and demons. Do you mean they are on Earth in compliance with the will of God? There is a Scriptural reference where an angel came down from heaven at the order of Jesus? What verse is that?

I agree with you. And by agree with you, do not assume I mean that I agree with you. o_O

"I am" is not a claim of divinity. The vid explained it in detail. It is a trinitarian myth. The reason Christian's deny Jesus is God in Flesh has been expounded on in great detail. I am a unitarian and started a thread, The Case Against Trinitarianism. The trinity is not in the Bible. Sad...

Nice figurative implication you are making. See posts in other thread about angels in Genesis and Sodom & Gomorra.

Yet, the Jews did not ever take it as trinitarians do. I've stated repeatedly that "I am" is NOT a name of God nor a claim of deity.

I've said it repeatedly. Jesus is my lord but not the LORD God.

Haven't we been through this before? Don't bother! "The doctrine of the trinity" is not the trinity. It is moving the goalposts. I reject trinitarianism but admit there are some verses THAT APPEAR to support some of it. Funny how trinitarians cannot even admit the trinity is not in the Bible...

I wrote about this some years ago. "The Second Coming of Christ" is a title of an event, a figurative expression. Many people say they've seen Jesus appear to them. These literal experiences are not the event tied to Judgment.

No. Not fine. He has engaged in speculation to make a point. Such speculation does not mean he is stating his doctrine - that others are quick to pounce on as incorrect. The point of his speculation remains but trinitarians who've trolled this thread use anything to divert attention from verses...