Search results

This is not an answer to my question. Beyond that, it is such an illogical statement, it’s hard to imagine worse critical thinking than this. Please stop trolling this thread. This thread is about STRENGTHENING the case against the trinity. Bye now.

My question for you to answer is Please construct a stronger anti-trinitarian statement than 1 Corinthians 8:6. I ask because I cannot think of one. Another trinitarian front of error is to always be on offense, always attacking in the form of questions BUT NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS. So, answer...

No. As said, I will attack every front your ERROR takes.

I have attacked with scripture many times. However, the flaw in your language has many fronts and I am addressing each angle of ERROR. This includes: Logic Language Usage Definitions Mysticism/Dualism Denial Scripture is written by anti-trinitarians. ‘For us, there is one God, the Father’ 1...

Not accepting your foolishness. Mental gymnastics is not a personal attack. I am attacking your argument, your thought process, your playing word games. I am not attacking you.

Who are you to say what is accepted or rejected? Who appointed you to this “Board.” From who is it’s authority delegated? Copying and pasting aside, you managed to side step the basic question of this thread and the post you replied to.

It is not in the Bible. I know this being I read the Bible and am not ignorant at all. Like before the Protestant Reformation, people believe what they are told the Bible says. Just admit the trinity is not in the Bible and we can move on. Instead, you move the goal posts to claim 'the doctrine...

Reading comprehension. Do you not see the word 'if' in jaybird's sentence? The trinitarian trolls are so desperate not to concede a single point, they rely on deception and one logic fallacy after another. In this case, Appeal to Strawman. Let's pretend jaybird is making a statement that does...

It's so funny to watch you stuck on this while simultaneously ignoring Exodus 20:3

That's not a personal attack, just an undeniable observation. All trinitarians invoke mental gymnastics to support their false doctrine. Even abusing "Father" and "Son", which by definition, mean not equal in terms of beginning. As John 3:16 says, fathers beget sons. But this basic observation...

No. The trinity is NOT in the Bible despite trinitarian creative interpretations of unitarian text.

T-r-i-n-i-t-y. Not Biblical. Not in the Bible.

LOL. Nothing undermines trinitarians belief in this false doctrine. HINT: If the trinity were Biblical, it would, you know, be in the Bible. And that is why some Christians deny Jesus is God.

Yea, in the 4th century, the idea of the trinity came about.

If this is important the singular ‘me’ in the 1C is even more important.

LOL The creed is not of the Bible.

Reading comprehension. Whosoever believes qualifies or limits the world to a subset of the whole.

What an outstanding post!

As I previously wrote ...

"I am" is a common identifier, not unique to God. It is not a claim of divinity as Trinitarians allege. How come all the other people in the Bible who said "I am" are not worshipped by trinitarians as being God for saying "I am?"