Search results

How do you know this? (Let's watch the circular reasoning unfold)

Yea, cuz normal grammatical usage causes your flawed doctrine to fall apart.

Except it is not true. One trinitarian lie is that only a God can be accused of blasphemy. The accusation the Pharisees made was that he was the Messiah, not God incarnate.

I already have proven you wrong dozens of times. But there is one thing I want you to know: The head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 1 Corinthians 11:3 You must not have any other god but me. Exodus 20:3

The projecting man-is-God thesis onto the text is impressive mental gymnastics. Isaiah was an anti-trinitarian Hebrew, like all Bible writers who have rejected trinitarian interpretation of their text for 1,000 of years.

You are in ERROR to suppose a non-trinitarian interpretation is in ERROR.

Isaiah 9:6 does no such thing. The most obvious proof is Jews reject the man-is-God take on their own anti-trinitarian text. Isaiah 9:6[5] does not speak of a divine king (or Messiah). - فريق اللاهوت الدفاعي

The most important meaning of "equality" and "progress" is advancing evil via totalitarian ideology. “Equality” is un-American. It is a market tested term least offensive to freedom loving Americans whose founding principle is equal rights, not equality of outcomes. The meaning between equal...

It’s not logic but word definitions. You are the illogical one, using words improperly. Brother, literally means biological. If you want to use the word figuratively, the burden is on you to qualify it soul sister.

Sad. The Messiah was never prophecied to be God incarnate. Equating the 2 is pure trinitarian projection.

2 Attending him were mighty seraphim, each having six wings. With two wings they covered their faces, with two they covered their feet, and with two they flew. 3 They were calling out to each other. These seraphim are not God but elohim, heavenly beings (plural). God is included among the...

I have no idea what dots you suppose this connects as it says nothing about coming in the flesh. Another trinitarian attempt at picking various verses, stitch them together out of context and transpose your dogma onto it. The thing is the entire Bible is written by Unitarian (or monotheistic)...

This is an excellent assertion for another thread. Nowhere in the Bible is God incarnate prophesied. It does say God raised Jesus from the dead. Understanding language, logic and definitions, this means God was not made flesh but the one acting on flesh.

I’ve answered this about a dozen times already in different ways. See post # 468. It’s hilarious that you ask a question I JUST answered.

The only challenge I mind answering in this thread is how to strengthen the case AGAINST trinitarianism. Thanks.

I've already done the research. If you are in denial of the many errors in the KJV, bless your hear. Peace. Out.

You are reading what is not there. Not only is "I am" not a claim of divinity, Jesus never claimed to be 'the great I AM." 4 That’s why I told you that you will die here as a result of your sins. Unless you believe I am who I have said I am, your sins will lead to your death. John 8:24 (VOICE)

Your desperate Appeal to Strawman is ridiculous! The Bible is not you, with your nefarious motives. The Bible is supposed to be the Word of God, who does not lie. When the Word says James is the brother of Jesus, that has meaning. Meaning that goes against your theology.

1. HISTORY: The KJV of the Bible is the most influential book ever written in English. 2. PERSONAL: I will never read middle English books like that. 3. EPISTEMOLOGY: There are numerous errors in KJV that 4 centuries of improved knowledge has identified.

You cannot answer a question with a question. Jesus tells us to pray, 'Our Father, who art in heaven.' Some would say that is definitive. Again, hilarious trinitarians give no rational explanation as to why this verse should count more than the >5,000 times God is referred to in the singular.