Search results

That’s trinitarianism. Your comment in this post doesn’t contain the assertion that the Trinity is three beings.

The Creed expressly states that the Trinity isn’t three beings and you expressly state that the Trinity is three beings. The Trinity is three beings (you) who are not three beings (the creed). The Creed anathematizes anyone who denies that the Triune God is one being.

If you want to be a trinitarian then I want you to believe what trinitarianism teaches on the matter.

In John 1:1, God alone. The word which existed before the incarnation is the Father’s own word, not an angel.

Thank you. The feeling is mutual. I know. And you don’t think there is any benefit to you to gain an understanding of what and why I say the things that I do. That’s fine. Maybe I am; maybe I’m not. That doesn’t matter to me. I can benefit from having conversations with people who are...

My God is the Father alone. The Messiah’s God is the Father alone. Israel’s God is the Father alone. The Messiah will deal with the wayward rabbis of the world when the time comes. My plea to them is to repent and return to the God of the fathers. There is no God besides their God alone...

The rabbi abandoned the faith of the fathers when he abandoned Jewish unitary monotheism in favor of trinitarian monotheism. John 1:14 is the incarnation of the Father’s logos / davar / memra. Shame on the rabbi for turning his back on the God of Israel, the Messiah’s God.

I don’t know. I haven’t watched it. I’m not here to watch videos. I’m here to have conversations. I’ve responded to some things he’s written which I believe are wrong. I’ve also responded to some things he’s written which I believe are correct.

That last line didn’t age well; nor should it have.

I was presenting my position to a general audience. You’ve already established that. I don’t disagree with it. I believe a conversation with you would benefit me, but follow your conscience. Do you think a conversation with the trinitarians will benefit you? Do you think a conversation...

Where there are ten Protestants and one Jewish monotheist gathered together, the Protestants (who believe in the Trinity) are deemed guilty of “the greatest heresy” and the Jewish monotheist (who does not believe in the Trinity) is deemed guilty of “a lesser heresy”. That would not constitute...

“There are not three eternal beings.” - Athanasian Creed “There are three beings.” - you

Your logic is diametrically opposed to the logic of the Athanasian Creed.

Contra the teaching of trinitarianism. Trinitarians would be quick to correct me if I said what you did. You’re getting a pass from them.

There is a difference between “persons” and “beings” in trinitarian theology. Other trinitarians know it and have said so. Why don’t you?

That’s not what John wrote in John 1:1.

“In the beginning was the plan of Yahweh, and the plan was with Yahweh, and the plan was Yahweh’s. The same plan was in the beginning with Yahweh. All things were done according to it, and without it nothing was done, that was done. In this plan was life, and that life was the light to mankind...

True. True. No. It. So is God’s. So is Christ’s. So is John’s. So is everyone’s. “In the beginning was the word (davar / logos / memra), and the word was with God and the word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it, and without it was made nothing...

True or false. Davar (Hebrew), logos (Greek) and memra (Aramaic) are synonymous terms. True or false. Everyone has their own davar / logos / memra. If it’s true, is your davar / logos / memra a person who is you and another person with you? Is your davar / logos / memra a “he” or an “it”...

Hello. I never expected to hear from you again. What happened that caused you to change your mind?