Search results

They were not. Look at this... Matthew 13:38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; Can you see here how Jesus contrasted the children of the kingdom (good seed/wheat) with the children of the wicked one (tares)...

Jesus Himself did not put Mary on a pedestal like Catholics do. Not at all. I wonder if they have never read this: Matthew 12:46 While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. 47 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are...

Right. He said "ye" and "you" in relation to seeing an event that He expected the disciples and His audience (at least some of them) to see in their lifetimes. An event that would involve people being killed with swords (Luke 21:24).

He's quite sensitive, isn't he? He thinks only he should be allowed to make insulting comments.

That isn't what it says. The only way that anyone has ever been saved and entered the kingdom of God/heaven is by faith and they did not have faith. What are you talking about? How do you think someone was saved in old covenant times and how in new covenant times? What is your point here?

It's blasphemous. Terrible. You're right that Mary would not approve. It would make her sad and probably angry as well.

This forum is not a place to just copy and paste the contents of books in. Good grief. Just post a link to a site where people can read your book if they want. No one is going to read it here.

@Grailhunter If you don't differentiate between the deity of Jesus and the humanity of Jesus, it just leads to confusion. You think verses that only speak of His humanity prove He is not God, but they do not because they are only referring to His humanity in those verses and not His deity.

Need to look at scripture which says Jesus created all things, which you deny. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made...

What do you mean by this? How do you think people entered into the kingdom during old covenant times? The tares were never in the kingdom. Jesus contrasted the children of the kingdom, represented by the wheat, with the children of the wicked one, represented by the tares.

It is that simple, but you don't want to accept it, so you make it too complicated to accept.

Yeah. So? You think the tares only refer to the chief priests and Pharisees? Why do you take that so literally? Do you never consider whether or not your interpretation of one verse is contradicting any other verses? Do you believe the scribes and Pharisees had more influence over who enters...

It's so clear that you were delivered from deep spiritual darkness. It's great to see! Let's pray for these people who are still blinded by false teaching so that they can see who Jesus really is.

Says the guy who frequently calls his claims "undeniable".

You're not interpreting that correctly, but, unfortunately, it's partly because of the way that verse is worded. If you look at the parable as a whole and read everything He said about it, you should see that all He meant there was that He has His angels separate the children of the wicked one...

You're not differentiating between the deity and humanity of Jesus. Do you believe that Jesus created all things as these scriptures teach: John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were...

That explains a lot. I was wondering what his religion is. Notice how ridiculous his argument was. Obviously, the context of what was being discussed was in relation to the God who created all things, but he interjected with the irrelevant point that Satan is also a god. We're not talking about...

If only you actually understood what is written in Hebrews 8 to 10 then I would win. But, you don't. Ask God to explain it to you since I apparently am not able to do so.

So, explain it then. What did you mean when you said "Jesus' blood is not the New Covenant, but the purchase price of the covenant."?

No, I don't believe that. Who would ever say that the gospel doesn't need to be preached anymore? Of course I'm not saying that. I'm saying that the new covenant has been fully in effect since Christ shed His blood of the new covenant which provides for the forgiveness of sins (Matt 26:28)...