Not surprisingly, he just completely ignores it when we point out the folly in his logic by showing how it would make complete nonsense out of Revelation 11 and 12. At least we know unbiased observers can see how faulty his interpretive approach is.
Yawn
Whatever my friend. Do you want me to do to rev 11 and 12 what I did to rev 19 and 20
Rev 11:
Seventh Trumpet: The Kingdom Proclaimed
Then the seventh angel sounded: And there were loud voices in heaven, saying, “The kingdoms of this world have become
the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ, and He shall reign forever and ever!” And the twenty-four elders who sat before God on their thrones fell on their faces and worshiped God, saying:
“We give You thanks, O Lord God Almighty,
The One who is and who was and who is to come,
Because You have taken Your great power and reigned.
The nations were angry, and Your wrath has come,
And the time of the dead, that they should be judged,
And that You should reward Your servants the prophets and the saints,
And those who fear Your name, small and great,
And should destroy those who destroy the earth.”
Then the temple of God was opened in heaven, and the ark of His covenant was seen in His temple. And there were lightnings, noises, thunderings, an earthquake, and great hail
Now a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a garland of twelve stars. 2 Then being with child, she cried out in labor and in pain to give birth.
If you can not read the above, an realise that the words (and great hail) was the finality of the 7th trumpet.
And then what followed is going BACK to when christ was born. In other words, IT IS A DIFFERENT EVENT
And if you try to look at rev 19 and 20. And where there is NO logical conclusion at the end of 19. And 20 begins a different event. So you would have to ASSUMe something in rev 20 that does NOT have to be assumed in rev 12
Then I do not know how to help you