26 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

[WPM]

Have you decided that you're never going to speak for yourself anymore and are just going to let AI speak for you from now on, at least when it agrees with you? I'm not understanding your reasoning for trusting this AI when you obviously disagree with some of what it said.

I have no interest in continuing this discussion unless you actually give your interpretation of Zechariah 14:16-21. Until you do that, I have no reason to take anything you or your AI say about Zechariah 14 seriously.

Exactly. He is not prepared to think for himself as well. AI is going to produce a generation of clones who cannot think for themselves. They cannot reason. They refused to depend upon the Holy Ghost.

 

[JimKnox]

You're being a jerk by making claims while doing literally nothing to back them up. I'm afraid you are in way over your head on this forum and you probably should just observe the discussion instead of trying to add your useless input.

Maybe it is you.
Your pride will be your downfall.

 

[Davidpt]

Exactly. He is not prepared to think for himself as well. AI is going to produce a generation of clones. I cannot think for themselves. They cannot reason. They refused to depend upon the Holy Ghost.

Once again you are clueless about me. I'm able to think for myself better than you are for yourself. Some of the stuff you believe about Zechariah 14 didn't come solely from you thinking for your self. You are clearly borrowing some of that from Commentators you have read, books you have read, etc. And I know it and you know it.

As to me, everything I conclude about Zechariah 14 came from my own reading of it. That AI isn't coming up with things I don't already know myself. It is coming up with things I already agree with. I didn't ask it what Zech 14:9 means, as if I didn't know. I asked it that in order to see if it might agree with my understanding or contradict my understanding. It obviously did the former.

I didn't ask it if Zech 14:9 + 2 Thess 2:4 still = there shall be one LORD, and His name one---as if I didn't know. I asked it that in order to see if it arrives at the same conclusions I do. And sure enough it did.

There is not one thing that AI argued that I don't alredy know and agree with. The truth is, compared to the way I write and express my arguments in writing, an AI can certainly articulate it better than I ever could.

But let's just pretend, though it isn't true, that I'm using AIs to help me better understand something. How would that be any different than you using outside sources, which is clearly true in your case, but maybe not every case, to help you better understand something? How does that equal you thinking for yourself?

 

[WPM]

Once again you are clueless about me. I'm able to think for myself better than you are for yourself. Some of the stuff you believe about Zechariah 14 didn't come solely from you thinking for your self. You are clearly borrowing some of that from Commentators you have read, books you have read, etc. And I know it and you know it.

As to me, everything I conclude about Zechariah 14 came from my own reading of it. That AI isn't coming up with things I don't already know myself. It is coming up with things I already agree with. I didn't ask it what Zech 14:9 means, as if I didn't know. I asked it that in order to see if it might agree with my understanding or contradict my understanding. It obviously did the former.

I didn't ask it if Zech 14:9 + 2 Thess 2:4 still = there shall be one LORD, and His name one---as if I didn't know. I asked it that in order to see if it arrives at the same conclusions I do. And sure enough it did.

There is not one thing that AI argued that I don't alredy know and agree with. The truth is, compared to the way I write and express my arguments in writing, an AI can certainly articulate it better than I ever could.

But let's just pretend, though it isn't true, that I'm using AIs to help me better understand something. How would that be any different than you using outside sources, which is clearly true in your case, but maybe not every case, to help you better understand something? How does that equal you thinking for yourself?

Stop avoiding the issues. If you want to use AI to refute what I have been teaching then you have to put all your conversation on the table or we will discard it as manipulating a predetermined answer, which is what I suspect, and which you have done previously.

What question did you ask AI? Give me it word for word. This influences AI responses. Humans normally get a desired answer by slanting their queries to point AI in a particular direction. Give me your question or questions word for word. It is not fair quoting AI if you do not give the context to this reply.

Also, what word did I drop from the LXX and misquote?

1 Corinthians 5:5 and 2 Corinthians 1:14 do read “hemera ho kurios” in the original text.