A Biblical Lesson on Spiritual Discernment

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,759
7,171
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
@rwb , I don't think they know they believe this because it's the easiest conclusion to hold, but in practice that is the case. Why else would anyone not take the time to notice how inconsistent, conflicting, and unsound the foundation of this whole theory actually is? It simply does not fit the context, the narrative, or the declarations of the prophetic text. This is why they have to artificially divide the one verse into two different eras "in order to" force it to fit their narrative. For example:

Mark 13:4
  • "Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign when all these things shall be fulfilled?"
There is NOT the slightest suggestion here that this verse speaks of two entirely different eras.
So what? That can be clearly seen by how Matthew recorded the questions.

It's speaking of one event, which is when these things occur, then will be the sign of His coming.
The disciples likely believed that Christ's second coming and the end of the age would coincide with the destruction of the temple buildings, but Jesus, of course, would have known better than that. And the Holy Spirit knew better than that which is why He inspired Matthew to record the questions differently so that we can see that Jesus would be answering questions about two different eras and events.

If they believe in the 70 AD theory then it's easy for people to distort this passage (and others like it) and claim without any Biblical validation, that it refers to two different eras entirely.
You are the one who distorts many scripture passages, so no one here has any reason to take you seriously when you, a person who denies the existence of personal spirit beings called the devil (Satan), demons/devils and angels. You have zero credibility.

As an example, it's easier for me to believe that Satan was not bound at the cross "if" I hold to a Dispensationalist theory.
LOL. Ridiculous statement.

Also, things which "appear" right at first glance are often found wanting when compared with the "whole" of Scripture in the light of scripture, defined by scripture.

Luke 21:5-11
  • "And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said,
  • As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
  • And they asked him, saying, Master, but when shall these things be? and what sign will there be when these things shall come to pass?
  • And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.
  • But when ye shall hear of wars and commotions, be not terrified: for these things must first come to pass; but the end is not by and by.
  • Then said he unto them, Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom:
  • And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven."

Unless we would be Preterists, this answer Christ gave doesn't "fit" the context at all!!! :laughing:
That passage fits the context of His second coming and the end of the age. Your inability to spiritually discern that Jesus spoke of two different events, one being local to Judea and Jerusalem that occurred in 70 AD and one being global that will happen at His future second coming is what makes this thread so ironic. For you to think you have anything to teach anyone about spiritual discernment is just downright hilarious and extremely ironic.
 

claninja

Active Member
Dec 11, 2022
682
123
43
the south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Christ does this by telling them and us to understand the AOD spoken of by Daniel the prophet.

That’s your interpretation of what that’s supposed to mean. That’s not clear instruction that Christ connects the AOD to the cross.

When they admired the city, temple and buildings they were going back to the Old Covenant. Which is why Christ told them all these things shall be destroyed. He wanted them to understand that with His coming and making atonement for sins, the Old was already GONE forever spiritually and because of that all these Old things would be destroyed.

Ok, so then you agree the answer to the disciples question “when shall these things be?”, in regards to the temple destruction, Is answered by Christ throughout the OD?
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,759
7,171
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I am surprised that no one really understand what the "times of the Gentiles" is. :rolleyes:
Yes, of course, only you understand. LOL. Could you be more arrogant if you tried? I don't think so. You think you know it all and you know nothing. How about instead of saying pointless things like this, instead share your understanding of what the times of the Gentiles is. And show that in context with what is written in Luke 21:20-24.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,759
7,171
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You assume Matthew 24 must be interpreted literally because you begin with that presupposition. But Christ repeatedly taught in spiritual language that only those with ears to hear would understand (Matthew 13:10-17; Mark 4:11-12). This is a big difference between you and me!
That's a big difference between you and almost everyone! You try to spiritualize almost the entire Bible. It's a joke.

Tell me, can we take what Jesus said in the following passage literally at face value or is there some spiritual meaning that we should take from what Jesus said here...

John 5:28 Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice 29 and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.

Jesus did not predict the destruction of earthly Jerusalem so believers could merely escape to literal mountains. Rather, He spoke prophetically concerning the judgment of His New Covenant congregation at the end of the age, using Old Testament covenant language and imagery.

The New Testament identifies the true Judea and Jews spiritually, something that you lack to understand:
  • Romans 2:28-29 — "For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly... but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly..."
  • Philippians 3:3 — "For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit..."
  • Galatians 6:15-16 — the Israel of God is God's covenant people in Christ.
  • Hebrews 12:22 — Believers have come unto mount Sion, the heavenly Jerusalem—not an earthly mountain.
  • Revelation 14:1 — The Lamb stands upon mount Sion with His redeemed.
Where does any of that refer to a spritual Judea? None of them do. You are resorting to just making things up in your imagination in order to keep your doctrine afloat. And we're supposed to learn spiritual discernment from you? No.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,759
7,171
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Yes, they were looking back toward the Old Covenant physical realities, but the answer Christ gave them should have made them (and it did) look ahead. Because Christ links the AOD with the crucifixion of Christ which is that which was spoken by the prophet Daniel. Christ never gives the slightest answer as to when the Old Covenant physical realities would be utterly destroyed. He is simply telling them to stop looking back as you Preterits tend to do.
Who fled to the mountains when Jesus was crucified? Why was it particularly difficult for nursing mothers and pregnant women to flee? Why did He say to pray that it wouldn't happen during the winter or on the Sabbath?
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,780
995
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No, Christ doesn't talk about the cross, it is in reading from the prophet Daniel that the connection between AOD and the crucifixion is made manifest.

The Abomination of Desolation spoken of by Daniel has nothing to do with Christ's crucifixion.

Daniel 9:26-27

(26) And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined

(27) And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
The passage does not say that the Abomination of Desolation is Christ's crucifixion.

Christ is the One who confirms the covenant with many which is His New Testatment Congregation. He is also the One who causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease—not because of the crucifixion itself, but when His work of securing and sealing all the elect is complete. Once every one of God's elect has been gathered, sacrifice is no longer needed. Selah.

Only then does the overspreading of abominations make the congregation desolate. The Abomination of Desolation belongs to the period AFTER Christ has confirmed His covenant with His New Testament congregation. It has nothing to do with the crucifixion itself or with animal sacrifices ending at the Cross.

The Abomination of Desolation concerns Christ's New Testament congregation, where apostasy brings spiritual desolation before the consummation. The AoD is indeed the mystery of iniquity! This is why Christ pointed His disciples to Daniel as a future event to be understood, not as something fulfilled at the Cross.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,759
7,171
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Okay, but Christ does not give them an answer for when the Old shall physically be destroyed. 70 AD is found nowhere in Scripture but must be read into the Bible by Preterits who cling to the Old after the New Covenant in Christ has come. Like the first century disciples of Christ, Preterits want to cling to the Old forgetting the Old came to an end with the advent of Christ coming to earth a man.
So, you think such a significant event as the killing of many Jews in Jerusalem and other parts of Judea and the destruction of the temple buildings that the Jews held in such high regard is not prophesied anywhere in scripture. Why wouldn't it be? It was God's wrath against the unbelieving Jews, showing what the consequences are when people refuse to repent and continue to rebel against Him. If He would do that even to the Jews, then everyone should realize that He is not going to give anyone a pass if they repeatedly refuse to repent.

How do you interpret the following passage...

Matthew 22:1 And Jesus answered and spoke to them again by parables and said: 2 “The kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who arranged a marriage for his son, 3 and sent out his servants to call those who were invited to the wedding; and they were not willing to come. 4 Again, he sent out other servants, saying, ‘Tell those who are invited, “See, I have prepared my dinner; my oxen and fatted cattle are killed, and all things are ready. Come to the wedding.” ’ 5 But they made light of it and went their ways, one to his own farm, another to his business. 6 And the rest seized his servants, treated them spitefully, and killed them. 7 But when the king heard about it, he was furious. And he sent out his armies, destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city.

If this is not about how the gospel first went to the Jews who, for the most part, rejected God's gospel invitation, resulting in many of them being killed and their city of Jerusalem being destroyed, then tell me what else this passage from the parable could be about?

What were "these great buildings" that Jesus said would be destroyed with no stone left upon another, if not the physical temple buildings standing at that time?

Mark 13:1 Then as He went out of the temple, one of His disciples said to Him, “Teacher, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here!” 2 And Jesus answered and said to him, “Do you see these great buildings? Not one stone shall be left upon another, that shall not be thrown down.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
16,663
9,189
113
51
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The way I have seen here lately, there's no point in posting the contradictions I see because they already have explanations for all of them, and they won't be persuaded. Why? Because they lack spiritual discernment!

Sad, but that is "generally" true. What's that old expression?

"When you're a Hammer, everything looks like a nail!"

The point is to examine the item first to see if it really is a nail, because perhaps it is just the pattern of a nail. Here is the patience of the saints. Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus to defer to the "authority" of the word of God to define terms. Whether stones, trees, a city, a temple, a tabernacle, the promised land, bread, wine, or anything else, it's not always as it seems. God defines His own terms. As Christ Himself so ably illustrated in the Healing/Restoration of the Blind man spoken of in the book of Mark. While he was blind, men appeared ὁράω or [horao], as trees. That is to say, until that man was healed by Christ, and it was then that He said that the trees were actually men. Where once he was blind and saw mysterious imagery, now he saw the truth of what they were. Selah!

Mark 8:23-25
  • "And he took the blind man by the hand, and led him out of the town; and when he had spit on his eyes, and put his hands upon him, he asked him if he saw ought.
  • And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking.
  • After that he put his hands again upon his eyes, and made him look up: and he was restored, and saw every man clearly."

This is a whole Spiritual lesson in itself! To be blind is to be in spiritual darkness where you cannot see things as they actually are. They are seen as a mystery/secret. But once we are healed by Christ, our spiritual eyes are opened, and we can understand that the tree is actually a man. ...as in Revelation chapter 7 again. For example:

Revelation 7:3
  • "Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads."
God is not speaking about saving the physical earth, the sea, and the trees "until" all his servants are saved. It "appears" that way, but the truth is, the imagery in this context is of the world/creation. God is saying this judgment cannot come upon the people of the world (earth, sea, trees) that they are hurt UNTIL after He has saved His People from out of this world. For example, God is long-suffering, not willing that any of His elect are lost. Those who receive the seal become His people. The earth, sea, and trees represent the unsaved of the world (remember, a tree is known by its fruits?). The earth and sea, clearly represent the people of the world who are not spiritually healed. That's why they cannot be hurt until God patiently restores every single elect who is to be saved first. His servants must be sealed first before the loosening of the beast and the Great Tribulation. In other words, a great apostasy, a falling away from the faith is going to take place upon the world, but not until all Israel (the 144,000) are sealed FIRST! This is the mystery of God to reveal secrets to many, and blind others, as is His divine good Sovereign will.

...all that to say, not everyone is going to understand that the stones of the city and Temple represent people. These things are spiritually discerned. We can but pray for their understanding. However, whether they do or not see is all according to the will of God.

And when they don't, they fall back on the "it's a paradox" to explain how it is not actually true.

Well, indoctrination is a strong thing. Or others will play the dueling Scriptures game as if that will make your scripture null and void. Do they really think all God is interested in is the physical stones of a building falling down? Is a falling building the judgment that God speaks of concerning Israel? Is our Lord's interest in having them see their physical Temple fall, or is it in having them see their own fall? To have them (and us) consider God's Word "carefully" and understand what's really important is not physical--not meat and drink? It's what meat and drink represent!!

Luke 19:43-44
  • "For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,
  • And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation."
Did God discuss with a literal/physical City? Who are the city's children in this context? Right there we should understand the judgment of the city falling and being laid even with the ground, are the people! I mean, if we're being honest with ourselves, which is difficult to do when you are indoctrinated. A little spittle on the eyes and we can see this clearly! In this context, it is perfectly clear Christ is talking about the city representing the congregation, and it's children as the stones laid even with the ground. It's the people of his Old Covenant congregation and not the physical stones of a literal Jerusalem. The judgment is on the people as the spiritual city representing the house of the Lord, not the literal Jerusalem. He will lay the people even with the ground "as if" they were literal stones, not every literal stone in 70 AD as the misguided proponents of Josephus imagine! It's the "imagery" of total destruction in the fall of Israel at the cross. Not 70 AD, at the cross! And its restoration in the Resurrection of Christ. Just as with the Temple:

John 2:19-21
  • "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
  • Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
  • But he spake of the temple of his body."
The Romans did NOT destroy the Temple of prophecy; the people of Israel did! The Jewish people asked for a "Sign" that Christ had authority to cast out these buyers and sellers out of the Temple, and Christ replied, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up!" That was the Sign, but as the people of the congregation today, the people of the congregation then missed it; because they were so busy looking toward the literal Temple rather than the one God actually had in view. Selah. And Christ rebuilt it, stone upon stone, through His resurrection. Selah.

Romans 11:11
  • "I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy."
That's how the Old Testament representative congregation Israel fell, and this is how it was restored in the New Testament or Covenant with Israel representation; the church. As I said before, both the Temple and the city represented the Lord's congregation.

Luke 13:34-35
  • "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not!
  • Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."
Can a Physical/literal city kill the prophets, can it stone those sent to it? ...or is the Lord Jesus Christ speaking to a congregation, to a spiritual city? The people's house was left desolate because they didn't know the time of their visitation, and rejected their Messiah. May we pray that God will show mercy and give many the wisdom to discern THE TRUTH of His Most Holy Word instead of being decevied with 70 AD nonsense! More example on the next post...

@rwb
people inhabit cities

When God mentions a city it is a 'given' that He is speaking of the inhabitants.

Christ Returned in 70AD and the Resurrection already occurred = straying from the Truth

shun profane and idle babblings, for they will increase to more ungodliness.
And their message will spread like cancer. Hymenaeus and Philetus are of this sort, who have strayed concerning the truth, saying that the resurrection is already past; and they overthrow the faith of some.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
16,663
9,189
113
51
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The Abomination of Desolation spoken of by Daniel has nothing to do with Christ's crucifixion.

Daniel 9:26-27

(26) And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined

(27) And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
The passage does not say that the Abomination of Desolation is Christ's crucifixion.

Christ is the One who confirms the covenant with many which is His New Testatment Congregation. He is also the One who causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease—not because of the crucifixion itself, but when His work of securing and sealing all the elect is complete. Once every one of God's elect has been gathered, sacrifice is no longer needed. Selah.

Only then does the overspreading of abominations make the congregation desolate. The Abomination of Desolation belongs to the period AFTER Christ has confirmed His covenant with His New Testament congregation. It has nothing to do with the crucifixion itself or with animal sacrifices ending at the Cross.

The Abomination of Desolation concerns Christ's New Testament congregation, where apostasy brings spiritual desolation before the consummation. The AoD is indeed the mystery of iniquity! This is why Christ pointed His disciples to Daniel as a future event to be understood, not as something fulfilled at the Cross.
verse 27 is not about Christ
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,759
7,171
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The Abomination of Desolation spoken of by Daniel has nothing to do with Christ's crucifixion.
I agree that it doesn't refer to Christ's crucifixion itself, but then you say this...

Daniel 9:26-27

(26) And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined

(27) And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
The passage does not say that the Abomination of Desolation is Christ's crucifixion.

Christ is the One who confirms the covenant with many which is His New Testatment Congregation. He is also the One who causes the sacrifice and the oblation to cease—not because of the crucifixion itself, but when His work of securing and sealing all the elect is complete.
You reveal your lack of spiritual discernment yet again. Daniel 9:27 is talking about when Jesus established the new covenant with His blood during the 70th week which also made the old covenant and its sacrifices and offerings obsolete. It's not talking about causing the sacrifices and offerings to cease in the future.

Hebrews 8:6 But in fact the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, since the new covenant is established on better promises. 7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.... 13 By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.

Hebrews 10:5 Therefore, when He came into the world, He said: “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, But a body You have prepared for Me. 6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You had no pleasure. 7 Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come—In the volume of the book it is written of Me—To do Your will, O God.’ ”8 Previously saying, “Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin You did not desire, nor had pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the law), 9 then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.” He takes away the first that He may establish the second. 10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

Read Daniel 9:27 in light of the above passages so that you can see what it's referring to when it talks about Jesus confirming the new covenant with many and making an end of sacrifices and offerings.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
16,663
9,189
113
51
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Grammatical referents.

"He" refers back to "prince" refers back to "Messiah the Prince".
Grammatically Verse 25 identifies "Messiah the Prince"
Grammatically in Verse 26 "Messiah the Prince" is CUT-OFF = Messiah is now removed from the sequence of events
Grammatically in Verse 26 a new prince arrives and he is called "the prince of the people"
Grammatically in Verse 26 "the prince of the people" comes to destroy
Grammitically in Verse 27 the "he" is referring to "the prince of the people"

Grammatically a THIRD person is mentioned = "on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,

How many spiritual "princes" in Daniel???