A Biblical Lesson on Spiritual Discernment

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
37,861
61,636
113
54
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Please Respond Question?

1.) Does Isaiah 66:3 below reference animal sacrifice taking place

Point Of Interest:
The word "Delusion" is used 2 times in the KJV, and they are both associated with a house/temple, and it appears that the scripture presented could be "Parallel Readings" of the same event?

Isaiah 66:1-4KJV

1 Thus saith the Lord, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest?

2 For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the Lord: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word.

3 He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations.

4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

2 Thessalonians 2:10-11KJV

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
Lets look at this verse eleven real closely .
Now tell me do you notice an event that seems to be gaining ground
and is able to bring together as one the false religoins and decieved within christendom .
DO you see the lie within this .
There is a love that all religoins , that much of christendom , that even athiest and wican do embrace .
And within it a peace that they beleive can be attained upon earth .
AND YET within this peace plan , IT HAS DENIED the DIRE absolute necessity for to have to believe on JESUS the CHRIST .
I SEE both a love and a peace that now merges THE DECIEVED to be as one .
ONLY it wont be peace n safety for them ON JESUS DAY .
I SEE such a deluison at work and it be g rowing . ONLY more and more are seeing this delusion
as THOUGH it be the LOVE of GOD ,as though it be HIS plan for peace .
As though it be OF GOD HIMSELF . when clearly its of satan and has denied The one true gospel
and by its love has called evil good and good evil .
WELOCME to all inclusive ecuminecal intefaith interreligous dialgoue . THE DELUSION that jus keeps on GROWING
and is convincing ALL RELIGOINS on earth that they be serving THE SAME GOD and this is HIS PLAN for peace .
So , my advice is to far and wide from those that support such a thing .
FOR we cannot be partakers and co helpers to BOTH THE TRUTH AND A LIE . IT was always the lie .
And it must be ONLY THE TRUTH . flee the harlots den and let none ever even glance back .
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
6,156
7,666
113
68
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Female
The way I have seen here lately, there's no point in posting the contradictions I see because they already have explanations for all of them, and they won't be persuaded. Why? Because they lack spiritual discernment!

Sad, but that is "generally" true. What's that old expression?

"When you're a Hammer, everything looks like a nail!"

The point is to examine the item first to see if it really is a nail, because perhaps it is just the pattern of a nail. Here is the patience of the saints. Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus to defer to the "authority" of the word of God to define terms. Whether stones, trees, a city, a temple, a tabernacle, the promised land, bread, wine, or anything else, it's not always as it seems. God defines His own terms. As Christ Himself so ably illustrated in the Healing/Restoration of the Blind man spoken of in the book of Mark. While he was blind, men appeared ὁράω or [horao], as trees. That is to say, until that man was healed by Christ, and it was then that He said that the trees were actually men. Where once he was blind and saw mysterious imagery, now he saw the truth of what they were. Selah!

Mark 8:23-25
  • "And he took the blind man by the hand, and led him out of the town; and when he had spit on his eyes, and put his hands upon him, he asked him if he saw ought.
  • And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking.
  • After that he put his hands again upon his eyes, and made him look up: and he was restored, and saw every man clearly."

This is a whole Spiritual lesson in itself! To be blind is to be in spiritual darkness where you cannot see things as they actually are. They are seen as a mystery/secret. But once we are healed by Christ, our spiritual eyes are opened, and we can understand that the tree is actually a man. ...as in Revelation chapter 7 again. For example:

Revelation 7:3
  • "Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads."
God is not speaking about saving the physical earth, the sea, and the trees "until" all his servants are saved. It "appears" that way, but the truth is, the imagery in this context is of the world/creation. God is saying this judgment cannot come upon the people of the world (earth, sea, trees) that they are hurt UNTIL after He has saved His People from out of this world. For example, God is long-suffering, not willing that any of His elect are lost. Those who receive the seal become His people. The earth, sea, and trees represent the unsaved of the world (remember, a tree is known by its fruits?). The earth and sea, clearly represent the people of the world who are not spiritually healed. That's why they cannot be hurt until God patiently restores every single elect who is to be saved first. His servants must be sealed first before the loosening of the beast and the Great Tribulation. In other words, a great apostasy, a falling away from the faith is going to take place upon the world, but not until all Israel (the 144,000) are sealed FIRST! This is the mystery of God to reveal secrets to many, and blind others, as is His divine good Sovereign will.

...all that to say, not everyone is going to understand that the stones of the city and Temple represent people. These things are spiritually discerned. We can but pray for their understanding. However, whether they do or not see is all according to the will of God.

And when they don't, they fall back on the "it's a paradox" to explain how it is not actually true.

Well, indoctrination is a strong thing. Or others will play the dueling Scriptures game as if that will make your scripture null and void. Do they really think all God is interested in is the physical stones of a building falling down? Is a falling building the judgment that God speaks of concerning Israel? Is our Lord's interest in having them see their physical Temple fall, or is it in having them see their own fall? To have them (and us) consider God's Word "carefully" and understand what's really important is not physical--not meat and drink? It's what meat and drink represent!!

Luke 19:43-44
  • "For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,
  • And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation."
Did God discuss with a literal/physical City? Who are the city's children in this context? Right there we should understand the judgment of the city falling and being laid even with the ground, are the people! I mean, if we're being honest with ourselves, which is difficult to do when you are indoctrinated. A little spittle on the eyes and we can see this clearly! In this context, it is perfectly clear Christ is talking about the city representing the congregation, and it's children as the stones laid even with the ground. It's the people of his Old Covenant congregation and not the physical stones of a literal Jerusalem. The judgment is on the people as the spiritual city representing the house of the Lord, not the literal Jerusalem. He will lay the people even with the ground "as if" they were literal stones, not every literal stone in 70 AD as the misguided proponents of Josephus imagine! It's the "imagery" of total destruction in the fall of Israel at the cross. Not 70 AD, at the cross! And its restoration in the Resurrection of Christ. Just as with the Temple:

John 2:19-21
  • "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
  • Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
  • But he spake of the temple of his body."
The Romans did NOT destroy the Temple of prophecy; the people of Israel did! The Jewish people asked for a "Sign" that Christ had authority to cast out these buyers and sellers out of the Temple, and Christ replied, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up!" That was the Sign, but as the people of the congregation today, the people of the congregation then missed it; because they were so busy looking toward the literal Temple rather than the one God actually had in view. Selah. And Christ rebuilt it, stone upon stone, through His resurrection. Selah.

Romans 11:11
  • "I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy."
That's how the Old Testament representative congregation Israel fell, and this is how it was restored in the New Testament or Covenant with Israel representation; the church. As I said before, both the Temple and the city represented the Lord's congregation.

Luke 13:34-35
  • "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not!
  • Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."
Can a Physical/literal city kill the prophets, can it stone those sent to it? ...or is the Lord Jesus Christ speaking to a congregation, to a spiritual city? The people's house was left desolate because they didn't know the time of their visitation, and rejected their Messiah. May we pray that God will show mercy and give many the wisdom to discern THE TRUTH of His Most Holy Word instead of being decevied with 70 AD nonsense! More example on the next post...

@rwb
There is often more than one layer or depth/height to His words of truth though, I believe. Jerusalem and the Temple were also destroyed, as Jesus and the prophets prophesied would happen....and it served as an allegory for the spiritual.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,996
2,560
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Christ was speaking prophetically about His New Testament Church throughout this present age, culminating in His return at the end of the age.

It's not the Scriptures themselves, only how you seem to make the coming of Christ only about the New Testament Church while leaving out how Christ came first to the physical Jewish people. While coming with the Kingdom of God from heaven that all man (Jew & Gentile of faith) might enter therein through Christ's Spirit, is of course the main purpose for His coming. But Christ also came physically to deal with the physical nation of Old. I believe that's why the prophesy cannot only be spiritually interpreted but also involves physical interpretation of the physical things of Old. For instance, the city and temple while truly pointing to the spiritual Jerusalem and spiritual Temple were still physical things that were physically as well as spiritually destroyed with His coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee and WPM

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,939
3,525
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Not to mention. Take the KJV, for instance. The translators put Prince in verse 25 in Caps but did not do that with the prince meant in verse 26. Obviously, had the translators taken the 2nd prince to be meaning the prince in verse 25, they would have put that prince in caps as well. If nothing else it seems to prove the translators didn't take both to be the same person. What is the earliest known KVJ translation of those verses? Maybe this is not the case in the earliest ones?
Original KJV 1611:

Daniel 9
And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined.
 

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
37,861
61,636
113
54
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
There is often more than one layer or depth/height to His words of truth though, I believe. Jerusalem and the Temple were also destroyed, as Jesus and the prophets prophesied would happen....and it served as an allegory for the spiritual.
So long as them so called layers cometh not of men who twist but rather of the SPIRIT that reveals T RUTH .
As i am sure you would agree with THAT sister .
Cause we BOTH KNOW FULL WELL , and that by GRACE , we gots lots of thus sayeth the Lord and the Spirit ,
only to see they simply TWIST what it means to fit SOMETHING ELSE that ought never once have been taught
or to have implied it meant . SO allow the call to be made sister .
Let all who name the name of JESUS get in and read them bibles for themselves .
For if i had to name the name of even a tenth of those who cliam thus sayeth the LORD and yet it be a lie
I could not even number a t enth of the names of those who fleece this people .
Truth be told the list be so long i could not even probably name even a percent who do so .
OH its bad and not only is it bad sister , ITS REAL bad at how many now fleece this people
into a love and a peace THAT IS SO ANTI GOD , SO ANTI CHRIST it would make heads spin .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lizbeth and WPM

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
37,861
61,636
113
54
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Original KJV 1611:

Daniel 9
And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined.
speaking of vnto the end , i shudder in total terror , unable perhaps even to breathe , when i think about
WHAT Is going to come upon every hand that joined into ecumeincalism and its intefaith plan for peace , At THEIR END .
This world , these false religoins , this christendom
are now all being fleeced by a love and a peace THAT bE SO ANTI GOD and ANTI CHRIST
it would make their heads spin if they only knew this . Folks might say love a lot
but have no idea their love be of the world and NOT OF GOD
and folks might be running straight into an idea of such love and of such a peace
and yet have no IDEA that it wont be peace n safety for them , ON JESUS DAY but sudden
and swift destruction upon them all . And what kind of love would i have in me
IF i warned not , oH YEAH the love of the world that says judge not correc t not .
WE ALL BEEN LIED TOO . s eeker friendly was from the bowels of satan which c ame in
ONLY to prepare them all TO THE LIE of their own damanation and peridtion .
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,996
2,560
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Original KJV 1611:

Daniel 9
And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined

This 1611 translation suggests the translators believed Prince is referring to Messiah who was cut off. Even though "hee" is not caps, it seems obvious that "hee" in vs 27 is still speaking of Messiah who is the Prince, because there is not another Messiah or Prince introduced.

Daniel 9:26 (KJV16) And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined.
Daniel 9:27 (KJV16) And hee shall confirme the couenant with many for one weeke: and in the midst of the weeke he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the ouerspreading of abominations hee shall make it desolate, euen vntill the consummation, & that determined, shalbe powred vpon the desolate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
11,205
6,004
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
So bro, do you not consider the grammatical antecedent/referent of "he" in verse 27, to be "prince" in verse 26?

The criteria I apply are: Identify a previous object which matches the subject (i.e. "he") in number, and gender, and is in closest proximity to it.

The qualifying result is "prince", which matches "he" in number (both are singular), and gender (both are masculine), and is in closest proximity to it.

Your criteria?
Yes. The Messiah is the overwhelming focus. The reference
Who was in command and control of Titus and his army?
Agreed! He is in control of everything. But He uses earthly vessels.

This is not a hill worth dying on.

I overwhelmingly agree with you on this subject. I know where you are coming from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,996
2,560
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This 1611 translation suggests the translators believed Prince is referring to Messiah who was cut off. Even though "hee" is not caps, it seems obvious that "hee" in vs 27 is still speaking of Messiah who is the Prince, because there is not another Messiah or Prince introduced.

Daniel 9:26 (KJV16) And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined.
Daniel 9:27 (KJV16) And hee shall confirme the couenant with many for one weeke: and in the midst of the weeke he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the ouerspreading of abominations hee shall make it desolate, euen vntill the consummation, & that determined, shalbe powred vpon the desolate.

I found confirmation, or so I think may be confirmation in this verse in Dan 10. I noticed the 1611 translators did not capitalize "prince' of the Kingdom of Persia. Yet Michael one of the chief "Princes" is? Does this suggest the tranlators viewed Michael as belonging to the triune Godhead?

Daniel 10:13 (KJV16) But the prince of the kingdome of Persia withstood mee one and twentie dayes: but loe, Michael one of the chiefe Princes came to helpe mee, and I remained there with the Kings of Persia.
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
2,650
832
113
68
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Original KJV 1611:

Daniel 9
And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined.

Below, as the AI pointed out, but maybe you never read that part?


-----------------
"Just be aware that if someone tries to "debunk" your point by pulling up a picture of the 1611 edition and showing erratic capitalization, you can counter by pointing out that modern capitalization rules weren't applied to the KJV until Benjamin Blayney's 1769 edition—which solidified into print exactly what the translators had always believed in their commentaries: the two princes are completely different entities."
----------------
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
2,650
832
113
68
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This 1611 translation suggests the translators believed Prince is referring to Messiah who was cut off. Even though "hee" is not caps, it seems obvious that "hee" in vs 27 is still speaking of Messiah who is the Prince, because there is not another Messiah or Prince introduced.

Daniel 9:26 (KJV16) And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre desolations are determined.
Daniel 9:27 (KJV16) And hee shall confirme the couenant with many for one weeke: and in the midst of the weeke he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the ouerspreading of abominations hee shall make it desolate, euen vntill the consummation, & that determined, shalbe powred vpon the desolate.

The AI explained the history of KJV in great detail. Did you all not read what it said? The AI clearly said one cannot use the 1611 edition to prove anything one way or the other. Therefore, this is a strawman based on what the AI said. I'm simply using an AI as a tool for researching purposes. No different than using Google as a tool for researching purposes, for example. Obviously, the AI is not coming up with these things on it's own. It is from data it has gathered from multiple sources.

Once again, it is Preterists that have something to gain by having the prince that shall come to mean Christ. That way it agrees with their interpretation of the coming meant in Matthew 24:30. Shall come = a coming---Matthew 24:30 = a coming. Therefore, per their view, they are correct to interpret Matthew 24:30 in the manner they do since it agrees with Daniel 9:26 and that coming, and that Daniel 9:26 pertains to 70 AD, the same way Matthew 24:30 pertains to 70 AD. Not according to me, but according to Preterists. The rest of us, even @WPM, do not remotely align with Preterists interpretation of Matthew 24:30. And neither do you.

So why are you aligning with them here? You are contradicting how you interpret Matthew 24:30 via how you are interpreting Daniel 9:26. Daniel 9:26 plainly requires a prince that shall come sometime later on after the Messiah is cut off earlier. Preterists feel this can be explained, thus their interpretation of Matthew 24:15-30. Though, IMO, they are wrong, but at least they are trying to be consistent throughout. Unlike you and some others in this thread that have no answer for what coming of Christ took place after He ascended and before He returns? The reason you have no answer is simple. It is because that prince is not meaning Christ to begin with. Thus problem solved. And now you are no longer contradicting your interpretation of Matthew 24:30 no matter who you take the prince to be, as long as you don't take the prince to be meaning Christ.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: IndianaRob

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
13,088
4,130
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Daniel 8:11 is the physical stop (the sanctuary cast down, sacrifice taken away by force). Daniel 9:27 is when Jesus caused them to cease.
"Once Again I Strongly Disagree"

(The Little Horn) & (The Prince That Shall Come) are both the same bad guy, same "Future" destruction, same "Future" sacrifice stopped, same "Future" event in "Parallel" repeated teachings.

Daniel 8:9-11 Does Daniel's (Little Horn) stop the "Future" daily sacrifice taking place "literally" upon this earth "Yes" and this event has absolutely nothing to do with the Cross of Calvary and the New Covenant in the Lord's blood, nor 70AD Roman Armies in Jerusalem Destroying

A Literal Sacrifice Taken Away, A Literal Sanctuary Cast Down "On This Earth"

Daniel 8:9-11KJV
9 And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
10 And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.
11 Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of the sanctuary was cast down.

This very same (Little Horn) is the "He" in Daniel 9:27
that stops the daily sacrifice, the very same sacrifice in "Parallel Teachings" in Daniel 8:9-11 & Daniel 9:26-27

Daniel 9:27KJV
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: IndianaRob

IndianaRob

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2023
2,008
745
113
55
Louisville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The AI explained the history of KJV in great detail. Did you all not read what it said? The AI clearly said one cannot use the 1611 edition to prove anything one way or the other. Therefore, this is a strawman based on what the AI said. I'm simply using an AI as a tool for researching purposes. No different than using Google as a tool for researching purposes, for example. Obviously, the AI is not coming up with these things on it's own. It is from data it has gathered from multiple sources.

Once again, it is Preterists that have something to gain by having the prince that shall come to mean Christ. That way it agrees with their interpretation of the coming meant in Matthew 24:30. Shall come = a coming---Matthew 24:30 = a coming. Therefore, per their view, they are correct to interpret Matthew 24:30 in the manner they do since it agrees with Daniel 9:26 and that coming, and that Daniel 9:26 pertains to 70 AD, the same way Matthew 24:30 pertains to 70 AD. Not according to me, but according to Preterists. The rest of us, even @WPM, do not remotely align with Preterists interpretation of Matthew 24:30. And neither do you. So why are you aligning with them here? You are contradicting how you interpret Matthew 24:30 via how you are interpreting Daniel 9:26.
It doesn’t matter if prince is capitalized or not. Capitalization doesn’t prove anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,939
3,525
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Below, as the AI pointed out, but maybe you never read that part?


-----------------
"Just be aware that if someone tries to "debunk" your point by pulling up a picture of the 1611 edition and showing erratic capitalization, you can counter by pointing out that modern capitalization rules weren't applied to the KJV until Benjamin Blayney's 1769 edition—which solidified into print exactly what the translators had always believed in their commentaries: the two princes are completely different entities."
----------------
What commentaries?
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
2,650
832
113
68
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"Once Again I Strongly Disagree"

(The Little Horn) & (The Prince That Shall Come) are both the same bad guy, same "Future" destruction, same "Future" sacrifice stopped, same "Future" event in "Parallel" repeated teachings.

Daniel 8:9-11 Does Daniel's (Little Horn) stop the "Future" daily sacrifice taking place "literally" upon this earth "Yes" and this event has absolutely nothing to do with the Cross of Calvary and the New Covenant in the Lord's blood, nor 70AD Roman Armies in Jerusalem Destroying

A Literal Sacrifice Taken Away, A Literal Sanctuary Cast Down "On This Earth"

Daniel 8:9-11KJV
9 And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
10 And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.
11 Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of the sanctuary was cast down.

This very same (Little Horn) is the "He" in Daniel 9:27
that stops the daily sacrifice, the very same sacrifice in "Parallel Teachings" in Daniel 8:9-11 & Daniel 9:26-27

Daniel 9:27KJV
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

What I typically do is type up what I plan on submitting, in Notepad first, then paste, then send. If it's going to be a lengthy post. But posts like this one I simply type up in real time then send. Notepad is not needed in this case.
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
2,650
832
113
68
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It doesn’t matter if prince is capitalized or not. Capitalization doesn’t prove anything.

In later additions it proves that the translators didn't take both princes to be one and the same. Since it is absurd, that if they did, that they then capitalized prince in verse 25 but didn't in verse 26. Why not if thy bothered to do so in verse 25 and that they took both to be one and the same?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: IndianaRob

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
2,650
832
113
68
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What commentaries?

"### Did the Translators Believe They Were the Same Person?
Even though the 1611 translators didn't use capitalization to make the distinction, **your conclusion is absolutely correct:** neither the original 1611 translators nor the later 1769 editors believed the "Prince" of verse 25 and the "prince" of verse 26 were the same person.

We know this for two reasons:
1. **Historical Commentaries:** The KJV translators heavily relied on the notes of earlier Protestant Reformers like John Calvin and the Geneva Bible translators. Calvin explicitly stated that the "prince to come" in verse 26 was the Roman Emperor (and his generals, like Titus), who destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. They universally viewed verse 25's Prince as Christ, and verse 26's prince as a hostile, earthly conqueror.
2. **The KJV Margin Notes:** The 1611 KJV included margin notes to help clarify the text. While they didn't leave a note on this specific word, their notes throughout Daniel 9 consistently treat the Romans as the destroyers of the city.

### Summary
Your instinct to look at the capitalization is a great modern way to prove a point: the standard KJV text treats the two figures differently."
 

IndianaRob

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2023
2,008
745
113
55
Louisville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
In later additions it proves that the translators didn't take both princes to be one and the same. Since it is absurd, that if they did, that they then capitalized prince in verse 25 but didn't in verse 26. Why not if thy bothered to do so in verse 25?
I agree it’s absurd to think both princes are the same but what I’m saying is that capitalizing prince doesn’t change who that prince is.

The only way to prove who the prince in verse 27 is from the context of verse 27. The context of verse 27 is Jesus confirming the covenant God made to Abraham.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davidpt

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
7,939
3,525
113
75
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
"### Did the Translators Believe They Were the Same Person?
Even though the 1611 translators didn't use capitalization to make the distinction, **your conclusion is absolutely correct:** neither the original 1611 translators nor the later 1769 editors believed the "Prince" of verse 25 and the "prince" of verse 26 were the same person.

We know this for two reasons:
1. **Historical Commentaries:** The KJV translators heavily relied on the notes of earlier Protestant Reformers like John Calvin and the Geneva Bible translators. Calvin explicitly stated that the "prince to come" in verse 26 was the Roman Emperor (and his generals, like Titus), who destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. They universally viewed verse 25's Prince as Christ, and verse 26's prince as a hostile, earthly conqueror.
2. **The KJV Margin Notes:** The 1611 KJV included margin notes to help clarify the text. While they didn't leave a note on this specific word, their notes throughout Daniel 9 consistently treat the Romans as the destroyers of the city.

### Summary
Your instinct to look at the capitalization is a great modern way to prove a point: the standard KJV text treats the two figures differently."

Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 3, page 158, footnote 7 (Image)​

Tertullian (I, II, III)​

Apologetic. (HTML)​

An Answer to the Jews. (HTML)​

Of the Times of Christ's Birth and Passion, and of Jerusalem's Destruction. (HTML)​

CCEL Footnote 1226 (In-Text, Margin)​

Accordingly the times must be inquired into of the predicted and future nativity of the Christ, and of His passion, and of the extermination of the city of Jerusalem, that is, its devastation. For Daniel says, that “both the holy city and the holy place are exterminated together with the coming Leader, and that the pinnacle is destroyed unto ruin.”[Daniel 9:26] And so the times of the coming Christ, the Leader, must be inquired into, which we shall trace in Daniel; and, after computing them, shall prove Him to be come, even on the ground of the times prescribed, and of competent signs and operations of His.


Tertullian, more than 1,000 years before Calvin, identified Christ as the Leader (i.e. prince) in Daniel 9:26.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
13,088
4,130
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
It doesn’t matter if prince is capitalized or not. Capitalization doesn’t prove anything.
The company of 54 talented KJV translators who were confessing Christians showed (Messish the Prince) in caps because they were aware it was Jesus Christ Deity, they didn't cap (the prince to come) because these 54 scholars on the translating committee were aware the figure wasn't deity

The KJV committee were talented scholars of their day, and knew well what they were doing,

Jesus Is The Lord