I doubt that you're going to believe what I'm going to say. After all, you don't believe or understand (or are in denial of) how the word all is correctly used in scripture. So I have my doubts you'll see the difference about the words God and temple.
First of all. The word for temple used in 2 Thes. 2 is the word 'naos'.
3485. naos nah-os' from a primary naio (to dwell); a fane, shrine, temple :--shrine, temple.
That word is only used to describe the "holy of holies' when it is distinguished from the whole temple. The holy of holies isn't indicated here at all. There's no reason to assume that 2 Thes. 2:4 is refering to the Holy of Holies because the text has nothing to do with the Jews or inner sanctuary because the direct attention of the text is related to the man of sin.
naos...
1) used of the temple at Jerusalem, but only of the sacred edifice (or sanctuary) itself, consisting of the Holy place and the Holy of Holies (
in classical Greek it is used of the sanctuary or cell of the temple, where the image of the god was placed which is distinguished from the whole enclosure)
2) any heathen temple or shrine
http://www.bluelette...ngs=G3485&t=KJV
This word is the one used in Acts that describes the shrine of Diana that the idol stood in.
Acts 19:24 For a certain man named Demetrius, a silversmith, which made silver
shrines for Diana, brought no small gain unto the craftsmen;
Paul had about 20 words to chose from in the text. If he definitely wanted to indicate God's Holy Temple, he would have used a different word and very likely this one.
2411. hieron hee-er-on' neuter of 2413; a sacred place, i.e.
the entire precincts (whereas 3485 denotes the central sanctuary itself)
of the Temple (at Jerusalem or elsewhere):--temple.
But instead he used this one.
3485. naos nah-os' from a primary naio (to dwell); a fane, shrine, temple :--shrine, temple.
Here are the words he could have used.
http://www.eliyah.co...&isindex=temple
The word God in 2 Thes. 2 is theos. The first or primary meaning of it is that of a
god or goddess, and used in the name of deities.
http://www.bluelette...ngs=G2316&t=KJV
G2316
1) a god or goddess, a general name of deities or divinities
2) the Godhead, trinity
a) God the Father, the first person in the trinity
B) Christ, the second person of the trinity
c) Holy Spirit, the third person in the trinity
3) spoken of the only and true God
a) refers to the things of God
B) his counsels, interests, things due to him
4) whatever can in any respect be likened unto God, or resemble him in any way
a) God's representative or viceregent
1) of magistrates and judges
'Theos' is also similar to 'atheos' which means
112. atheos ath'-eh-os from 1 (as a negative particle) and
2316;
godless:--without God.
Paul had about 50 words to choose from and
chose the one that is used of pagan gods and magistrates when he described "the temple of God.".
http://www.eliyah.co...con&isindex=God
Thayers quotes about the word 'theos', "
A general appellation of deities or divivities." Thayer also says the word " is a generic term used by heathen writers.
http://www.bluelette...ngs=G2316&t=KJV
The word is used of the
only true God when the article is used like in Mt.3:9, Lk. 2:13, Acts 2:11,
Like here...Luke 2:13 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,
14 Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.
(the article is not used in 2 Thes. 2:4)
If Paul definitely wanted to indicate God's Holy Temple he
would not have used the word 'theos' which is typically used for pagan gods. And he would not have the word 'naos' which is used used for pagan shrines!
I use to believe many of the things you do. I use to believe in the RRE, a peace treaty with Israel, a global empire and united global religion of the beast, and this issue... etc. etc.
But I've changed my mind after studying them for myself from the words used in the original language. I doubt you'll ever change your mind because you would have to admit on a public forum that you've been wrong.
You obviously don't go into the depth I do studying these things. Why would you want to do that? It would debunk what you believe and you already have this all figured out anyway! You have fallen for and adhere to the teachings of the "prophecy experts."