I haven't read every post so I may be repeating what has been said. if that is the case, then it is reinforcing what has been said.Having completed a two years study of the church in the NT, which involved first of all looking at the scriptures in the original greek and then getting any book I could find on the subject, I came to the conclusion what we call church today is not in fact church.In the NT "the church" was known as "the way" originally and they were a branch of Judaism. They were not a seperate entity, so much of what they did reflected the religion of the Jews. There was no buildings as they met in homes (Acts 2); there was no clergy as they preached and acted out the priesthood of all believers who were all gifted in some area to build up the body of Christ; there was no paid pastor brought in from outside the church; leadership was by a plurality of elders chosen from within the congregation; they did not meet every Sunday morning as Sunday was an ordinary working day, they met occasionally as a church on Saturday which was the sabbath and the day of rest; there was no secular/sacred divide; they did not tithe, they gave as people had need bearing in mind that there were no buildings to finance or salaries to be paid.In essence the church was the people. Notice it said how much they loved one another, not what great meetings they had.Wherever they went they healed the sick, cast out demons and healed the brokenhearted. When they met in homes they fellowshipped together, were taught the apostle's doctrine, prayed together and shared meals. Breaking of bread in scripture means to eat a meal as no meal started until the host broke a loaf of bread and gave a piece to everyone. It was never a religious ritual. No metion here of them singing.The NT church never went to church because they were the church. You can't go to yourself. To "be" church all you need is two people and that can happen anywhere. Home, school, office, park, car park, street, cafe, beach, mountain, up a tree, the market, the bus stop, in the train. You notice it says that they went everywhere telling the good news of Jesus.Going to church in a purpose built place is a modern construct not to be found in scripture. Some people say you should not forsake the assembling together. If all you do is attend religious services in a building you are forsaking the assembling together because the context of that verse is meeting together in homes. if you don't do this, you are forsaking the assembling of yourself together even if you attend "church" on Sunday every week of the year. The two or three is more dynamic because the Christian walk is all about relationship. In most churches all you have relationship with is the back of other people's heads. In the home, you have a relationship with real people, face to face. In most churches you talk to half a dozen people and the rest are strangers to you. In the home you know everybody and you build a bond with each other. That is if you don't bring the ritual of the church into the home.My church is where I am. The truth is that religion and ritual in most cases will stop you from being the church. It prefers you to be a member of a specific organisation (denomination) to follow its traditions and ritual (membership) and spend your time being a promoter of it (works)In the meantime, God is holding out his hands to enfold you in his love and be a father to you. With a bit of luck you might talk to him once a week or five minutes each day. He wants more than that.I admit it might be a bit easier for me because I am retired, but I love to spend a whole afternoon on a sunny day sitting in the garden enjoying the birds and flowers, the trees, the sky, the sun and clouds rolling by and just having a one on one with the Lord. It keeps me young and excited. I only go to a "meeting" if it involves food. Why? Because that is what they did in scripture and the way to a man's heart is through his stomach. I guess God knew what he was doing.