DuckieLady
Well-Known Member
An interesting claim of the date for the crucifixion as the actual day Christ was born is still debated. I have seen a seven year spread as to the year in which Christ was born. How close to Jerusalem was the earthquake's epicentre is not given as a 8.2 earthquake would probably levelled Jerusalem not shaken it such that the curtain in the temple was torn from top to bottom. There is evidence of fractured rocks on steps near the temple mould, but as the Governmental and historical records of that time do not indicate such a large earthquake as claimed, occurred, I am happy with the account only in Matthew that the ground was shaken and rocks were split. This could have been as a result of an 8.2 earthquake some distant from Jerusalem as we see occurring today.
Shalom
Do ya'll see this ridiculousness here with this 8.0I would say look at what is said
rocks split and graves opened are signs of an earthquake not turmoil
what’s your thoughts
Feel like I'm watching Cloverfield IRL
NO THANK YOU
How is that not big enough? I'm going to have to take 2MG of melatonin tonight instead of 1MG