Why is anyone talking about his sexuality for then?How foolish to think animosity is against an individual because he is homosexual. It is the very-deadly-to-America agenda of the L-ABC-Q movement that has to be recognized.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why is anyone talking about his sexuality for then?How foolish to think animosity is against an individual because he is homosexual. It is the very-deadly-to-America agenda of the L-ABC-Q movement that has to be recognized.
For the same reason that if one of us ran for office, it would be assumed that we would back things of God. Do you think he would not be inclined to be prejudicial toward the homosexual agenda? Really?Why is anyone talking about his sexuality for then?
Good insight, because How can the pot call the kettle black when they both are in the same SIN. adultery and forinciation are forms of homosexuality. so how can a homosexual calls another homosexual sin for the same ACT.f he gets nominated, can you imagine the hatred that will be generated by the liberal media towards conservative Christian supporters of Trump, i.e. those who stand on the Biblical assertion that homosexuality is a sin? And what would a Buttigieg nomination force Trump to do? How would he respond to someone over the issue of homosexuality? Someone who was claiming higher moral ground, and that Trump's form of "Christianity" is bigoted and homophobic?
I appreciate your thoughts, but this part is projection. Personally I prefer brevity. @Willie T is one of the best writers here imo. He so often puts his thoughts into a single sentence. And I never seem to wonder what he means.Like I said, you like very long, drawn out conversations pretty much no matter what the topic,
I don't know what the "homosexual agenda" is. I thought gay activists were asking for equal rights.For the same reason that if one of us ran for office, it would be assumed that we would back things of God. Do you think he would not be inclined to be prejudicial toward the homosexual agenda? Really?
I appreciate your thoughts, but this part is projection. Personally I prefer brevity. @Willie T is one of the best writers here imo. He so often puts his thoughts into a single sentence. And I never seem to wonder what he means.
We go back and forth, we disagree on some things. But underneath it all we disagree on how one should handle the Bible, I believe.
You didn't speculate, and you didn't ask, but I'm going to tell you anyway, the reason I engage you in conversation is that I believe that we both stand to benefit from our exchanges, as we minister the Lord Jesus to each other.
And I for one want to both impart and receive that benefit, if at all possible. Because we disagree on some things there will be contention, which is only to say we each contend for our views, but it doesn't have to deteriorate into something less than love.
I have no desire to offend you, only that given the opportunity, believers help each other grow. To me that's what it's about.
I've found this forum to contain not only all the mish mash we know, but also discussions that have challenged and help form my views, that have given me much deeper undertstandings of other people's views, and that bring me encouragment. And on reflection, I haven't been bringing to you that same encouragment, and that's my wrong. I think I become so focused on discussions where I see a real potential to explore deep things, that becomes too much my focus, as I continue in my thought, I lose sight of you for the distraction of the discussion, Please forgive me. I mean that.
Anyway, I always look forward to reading your posts, and I appreciate whatever dialog we may be able to enjoy together.
Much love!
More to your credit than to mine, if you see something good in me, because that's what love does. I likewise have my agenda, but it's not really on a particular topic, more all topics, that being renewing the mind according to Scripture, in me, you, all of us. That happens with any Scripture, IF we properly understand it, and realize the fullness of it's meaning.Yes, I sensed that about why you discuss things, and it's to your credit.
I don't know what the "homosexual agenda" is. I thought gay activists were asking for equal rights. PARTIAL QUOTE]
A quite extensive explanation wasn't difficult to locate: Homosexual Agenda - Conservapedia
Why would another lame Left-Liberal who is a practising homosexual, and who stands for everything which is Anti-American, present *very real problems* for Mr. Trump?But they have one candidate lurking in the shadows that would not only present very real problems for Donald Trump politically...
The top item in the list was: Ignoring Christian morals and discouraging religiously based laws. I'm in favor of laws that promote the welfare of citizens, but I am adamantly opposed to laws based on any religion. Whoever wrote that article must not have much faith in Jesus if he thinks we need the government to impose Christian values.A quite extensive explanation wasn't difficult to locate: Homosexual Agenda - Conservapedia
He has no chance of getting the nomination. You are worried about nothing
It doesn't sound like you are discussing what those people wrote. Are you sure you read all 14 pages (5,576 words)? To just pull a sentence from here and a phrase from there does not represent what they spoke on.The top item in the list was: Ignoring Christian morals and discouraging religiously based laws. I'm in favor of laws that promote the welfare of citizens, but I am adamantly opposed to laws based on any religion. Whoever wrote that article must not have much faith in Jesus if he thinks we need the government to impose Christian values.
People who want to impose their views about religion on other people are not people I want to see in office, no matter what their religion is. I find the current "Hindu nationalism" situation in India shocking -- and I'm neither a Hindu nor a Muslim.
I also cannot understand how Christians can believe they're obeying the Golden Rule when they want to impose their religious views on others. It's distinctly unchristian to me. The Catholics got over it -- the Inquisition didn't work for them. I think maybe the religious right needs to get over it too.
If American voters have learned anything from the words and actions of the Democrats recently (especially the sham impeachment nonsense), it is that NOT ONE OF THEM can be trusted as the leader of the free world.
Why would another lame Left-Liberal who is a practising homosexual, and who stands for everything which is Anti-American, present *very real problems* for Mr. Trump?
Well then you are adamantly opposed to the laws which have governed America, and given it a leading role as a country which abides by the Rule of Law (until Obama appeared on the scene along with all his Deep State operatives)....but I am adamantly opposed to laws based on any religion.
I guess you just realized that you made a huge mistake by suggesting that Buttigieg would cause huge problems for Trump. So now I'm the one who is deaf. This man is not *frightening* just pathetic. And a few decades ago he would have been behind bars for his sodomy.I swear, Enoch, I think you went deaf about a year or so ago and never regained your ability to hear (or read for that matter, LoL).
I guess you just realized that you made a huge mistake by suggesting that Buttigieg would cause huge problems for Trump. So now I'm the one who is deaf. This man is not *frightening* just pathetic. And a few decades ago he would have been behind bars for his sodomy.