Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What is the difference between a Christian sinning and a Christian being a sinner ?
To sin is an action that can be repented for... whereas being a sinner is the state of one's fallen human spirit.It is who they are rather than what they do.
But to be a Christian is not to stop sinning - it is a redirection (repentance) of focus from serving self to serving God and neighbor.
actually the OT model is the same as the NT - Jesus was not teaching anything new - the Pharisees had simply legalized the message. The only difference between the people in the OT and NT is that they were not justified and therefore had to hide behind the sacrifice of animals rather than the saving blood of Christ.
NO! A Christian is dead to sin. A baby Christian still sin, but he or she is not a spiritual Christian.
(Romans 6: 1-2) “What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? By no means! We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?
(Romans 6:11) “In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus”
(1 Corinthians 3:1-3) “Brothers, I myself was unable to speak to you as people of the Spirit; I treated you as sensual men, still infants in Christ. What I fed you with was milk, not solid food, for you were not ready for it; and indeed, you are still not ready for it since you are still unspiritual. Isn’t that obvious from all the jealousy and wrangling that there is among you, from the way that you go on behaving like ordinary people?”
The Reformers grappled with this or a similar question and had come up with an answer succinctly summarized at monergism.com.
Although I am not a 'Calvinist' or 'Lutheran' per se I do strongly agree with them on this point...
"How is the Christian to see himself in this world? "Simul iustus et peccator" - "At the same time righteous and a sinner". Justification is forensic. In Christ, we are declared, counted or reckoned to be righteous when God imputes the righteousness of Christ (an "alien righteousness") to our account. Christ's righteousness ascribed to the redeemed individual without their personal merit. We are declared righteous in Christ, it is imputed to us -- it is counted as ours ... not infused in us. We are counted righteous in God's eyes because of Christ. But this does not make us righteous in ourselves. That will only happen at our glorification when Christ transforms these bodies to be sealed in righteousness. Justifying righteousness is something which always resides in the Person of Christ alone. The imputation of this "alien" righteousness is the only means by which man can be acceptable to God. As long as the Christian lives, he is guilty in himself, but "in Christ" he is righteous and accounted precious."
This is wrong of course....His righteousness is proven in US through grace. Through Christ we are enabled to fulfill the requirements of the law. Through Christ we walk as He did in the world. As He IS so are WE in the world.
Yes but even our so called righteousness is sin (and needs to be repented of) when compared to His Righteousness. We still remain sinners apart from Him is their point that many seem to miss.
Episkopos,
What inherent righteousness do you have apart from Christ? Is it not all an alien righteousness imputed to you on account of faith?
Episkopos - why do you ignore all the questions and points that people are making about your perfection and sinlessness and simply provide verses that you believe point to Christians never sinning again? You are ignoring the fact that you are less than perfect and that you act selfishly AND you are a Christian - just like all Christians do.