Welcome to the Forums BTW!I'm in the air about this subject. On one hand, I don't believe in separation of church and state. On the other hand I'm completely against the merger.For one, Government getting involved in anything we have to do with our personal lives has never been a good thing. The last thing we need is for them to control our "religious beliefs".Also, on the other spectrum, If the government were actually a believing bunch, things would be better without a doubt. However, I still don't feel that a state religion should be imposed, as it surely would be every bit as much as it's not legal to sell cars on sunday or liquor stores being closed on sundays.It is very hipocritical that our children are being forced to learn the doctrine of evolution, and the science of "the big bang" and are given only offers that point away from spirituality, in specifics Jesus Christ. While not offered a counter study or even an elective that could be chosen by the students and not forced, such as, Art, Athletics, Orchestra, Band, and others. Since the bible refutes the very foundation for the above required learning it can't be included as it is not "scientificaly recognisable"As far as using the Bible as a history source or literature, most are not even accepting the bible as a historic source (at least in the layman circuits). If the bible would be used as a literary resource, then it would fall into history much like Shakespear, whos writings while considered romantic, versed, and profound, are considered nothing more than musings. (although, some might try to use the "genius" to depect mans moral delemas and the results of the choices made of man)As electives, students are offered psychology and philosophy. While odd that it sounds teaching the musings of such as, Freud, or Socrates to Aristotle and others. Most are not required. However, the same musings of those are also refuted by the bible itself. So, as stated above,,,,, not considered viable. As the bible gives a definitive answer for human nature and a result of that nature.There's also denominational issues that are far more complex and held more closely to peoples hearts than the gospel itself. If even an elective were offered, it would have to be non biased to any religion as to promote "religous tolerance". There would have to be literaly thousands of courses offered. So, you'd get kids taking the teachings of budda combining them with vishnu and taking the others from allah and still more trying to add them to Jesus. More than likely end up with a universal theory such as Oprah teaches.So, with all the above said, I think it's simply a matter of money and not much more. Dispite the arguments non-believers would have. Another argument would be private schools which are offered, and the very ones that imply that a public school should not have "religion" based educational programs, don't understand that private schools cost money, while public schools are free. Home school is another sanction offered up, but again, not always viable due to the time parents would have, and there again, Money.Broken down, IMHO, if the bible were allowed to be taught as a class or used as a history resource, or a literary work, the ramifications on the spirituality of our children would be further stunted even more so than if it weren't allowed.An Idea to appease would be closer to the discetion of frogs in science classes. Most if not all classes offer students an alternative if they feel it's wrong to discet an animal. And even given a passing grade if they feel it's not right.Also, sex education is treated the same way, if the schools offer it. Most require a parents signature for the participation of that part of the corriculum.An even better Idea would be, to have "science of evolution" or "science of the big bang" offered as a whole other elective rather than a required part of learning.Either way, it still falls on the parents to guide and instruct the children in the ways of the Lord.I'm very much interested in reading other believers Ideas.