Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

[Taken]

@JimKnox

We all have our theory’s, since Official Reports “for the public” are Fantasy…. While the real Facts carry the Top Secret Stamp.

 

[JimKnox]

@ taken
That's ridiculous.

 

[Taken]

@ taken
That's ridiculous.

Sure. It doesn’t parallel with your theory.

My theory, did not dismiss effects of Jet fuel, did address another building, with some “unfavorable records for some politicians” blocks away.
And the “straight down fall” I found telling.

Maybe it is your theory that is ridiculous…
No one in the public has the true facts… and likely some involved ended up dead…

 

[CrowCross]

There may have been jets..and there may have been terrorist...but.....the 3 letter agencies paved the way then made sure they got the results they wanted...................WAR......................in the middle east...unstability.

Along with that they took away privacy....for our protection....and look where we're at now.

 

[CrowCross]

THERE WERE NO EXPLOSIVES. It was physics.

Why did the first responders report smelling plastic explosives?

Oh, where are the jet engines and fuselage components of the jet that struck the pentagon?

At first I thought like you...how could America be involved in such an event. No WAY!!!!!
But over the last 25 years....it's all come out.

 

[Rockerduck]

My perspective is this World belongs to God and has Sovereign control over His creation. This event is God's foreknowledge of the event that happened and a miracle we witnessed all over the World, that the buildings collapsed and caused wise men to be fools. for God makes fools of wise men and all those who do not know God. When there is no explanation, it is all God. Remember Luke 13:1-5

 

[Armour of God]

You don't have the evidence to support your nonsense either.
The following are FACTS:
Impact destroyed columns > fireproofing was stripped on impact > jet fuel and OFFICE FURNITURE,etc fires weakened steel trusses and other structural supports (fires burnt @ 1500-1800°) > trusses sagged > columns buckled > upper block lost support > progressive collapse straight down the load path via irresistible gravitational drop.

Once the first level dropped, the remaining levels could not resist the energy of the upper levels impact upon the lower level and it was a consecutive failure like dominoes.

THERE WERE NO EXPLOSIVES. It was physics.

It's true that the colums at the impact area could have been weakened and buckled causing those levels to drop.

But the columns on the levels below were not effected by any fire. They couldn't of just given way on their own creating an accelerated free fall. They must of provided resistance which would of caused the collapse to stop. At the very least there must of been a deceleration.

The only way a gravitational acceleration could occur is if those columns below were already sheared before the excessive load of the collapse reached them. That's the only way the physics of the collapse could happen.

You can slander us as much as you like but that's what, me, my classmates and engineering teachers concluded at the time when I was at university. We discussed it at length, did many calculations and were not influenced by media or politics.

Our findings were independent and purely based on engineering and physics

That isn't the only time a building has had a fire. There have been many fires in buildings all around the world. Some whole buildings have been engulfed by fire but not one of them collapsed in a gravitational accelerated free fall. Not one. Its impossible. It defies physics. It's contradictory to every building that's ever had a fire worldwide