The German philosopher Hegel was one of the fathers of socialism. Both Hitler and Karl Marx based their particular brands of socialism off of Hegel's philosophy. But one of Hegel's ideas that kind of trumps that is his theories on conflict resolution. If you understand about conflict resolution, then you'll understand much about globalist politics today, including the two-party political system in the U.S.
Hegel based his theory of conflict resolution on the nature of this world. It's about the idea of opposites in conflict with each other.
He labeld one side as thesis, the opposing side as antithesis, and the result of the conflict producing a third event he called synthesis.
Thesis against Antithesis = Synthesis
How is that idea applied? The goal is to control it, just as man does with two different electrical charges to power electrical devices.
With conflict resolution in man's affairs, if you can control BOTH sides of a conflict, then you can control the outcome, the result.
A simple example in the political realm:
A problem arises about union wages, the union wants an increase, but the company's profits are down and claim they can't afford it. They both have a meeting and negogiate. The company and union finally agree to a small wage increase with the union agreeing to a freeze in wages over a later period.
Take the ideas of Democracy and Communism, which are directly opposed to each other involving property rights, free elections, freedom of religion, free speech, control of business and ownership, right to assemble, etc. What would a synthesis of the two be like?
Hegel based his theory of conflict resolution on the nature of this world. It's about the idea of opposites in conflict with each other.
He labeld one side as thesis, the opposing side as antithesis, and the result of the conflict producing a third event he called synthesis.
Thesis against Antithesis = Synthesis
How is that idea applied? The goal is to control it, just as man does with two different electrical charges to power electrical devices.
With conflict resolution in man's affairs, if you can control BOTH sides of a conflict, then you can control the outcome, the result.
A simple example in the political realm:
A problem arises about union wages, the union wants an increase, but the company's profits are down and claim they can't afford it. They both have a meeting and negogiate. The company and union finally agree to a small wage increase with the union agreeing to a freeze in wages over a later period.
Take the ideas of Democracy and Communism, which are directly opposed to each other involving property rights, free elections, freedom of religion, free speech, control of business and ownership, right to assemble, etc. What would a synthesis of the two be like?