I'm not even talking about the rapture. Maybe that's the issue?Darby's teaching of a pre-trib rapture is found no place in scripture,
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm not even talking about the rapture. Maybe that's the issue?Darby's teaching of a pre-trib rapture is found no place in scripture,
Thinking about this again, maybe I have a better way to reply.It seems like you're trying to argue that a person has to believe in dispensationalism if they believe that animal sacrifices are no longer necessary, and it's an extremely poor argument to make.
Yes It Is, Darby's Teachings Of A Pre-Trib Rapture, Covenant Israel, Dispensations, Are All Under The Umbrella Of Darby And "Dispensationalism"Dispensationalism is NOT about Darby. Or Larkin. Or any others. It's from the Bible.
It seems you are unable to acknowledge the Biblical dispensations because you have this thing with Darby.
And if I can't split you from that, so be it.
Much love!
Already answered . . .Yes It Is, Darby's Teachings Of A Pre-Trib Rapture, Covenant Israel, Dispensations, Are All Under The Umbrella Of Darby And "Dispensationalism"
Opinion Thread Title "Dispensationalism"
Once Again
"Dispensationalism" = John N. Darby
"Dispensation" = Bible
Wikipedia: John Nelson Darby (18 November 1800 – 29 April 1882) was an Anglo-Irish Bible teacher, one of the influential figures among the original Plymouth Brethren and the founder of the Exclusive Brethren. He is considered to be the father of modern Dispensationalism and Futurism. Pre-tribulation rapture theology was popularized extensively in the 1830s by John Nelson Darby and the Plymouth Brethren, and further popularized in the United States in the early 20th century by the wide circulation of the Scofield Reference Bible.
Yes We Disagree, "Dispensationalism" Represents The Teachings Of (John Nelson Darby) "Dispensations" Was Just One Aspect Of His Many Teachings Within "Dispensationalism"Already answered . . .
I think you and I have not much more to share on this thread . . .
Much love!
And why not? That would be much better than your Bible published with false marginal notes!Adulterer C.I. Scofield and his 1909 reference Bible was the greatest world influence, in promoting Darby's teachings in the margins, with millions of copies sold
@L3astAm0ngManyB13ss3d Often discussions around dispensations seem to revolve around the distinction between the church and Israel in Scripture, rather than according to attempts to lump them together.......I don't know how it's theoretically viewed as such but this is my opinion.
God came and spoke for the first 4,ooo years to the ppl by himself, his angels ,his prophets and his word. This was the Father's dispensation among mankind and he had chosen a tribe after the fall in the garden through the seed of Abraham.
Then we see the son's dispensation prophesied that he would be God come in the flesh born, tempted and dying like a man that the understanding would be yes I i know what you go through. By grace through faith the Son, JesusChrist is OUR only way to the Father at this time.....and for the last 2,000 some years.Again we have the word.
Then we see that Jesus returned to heaven and sat down on the right side of the Father's throne to be our advocate and interceed on our behalf but ..........
He sent back the promise of the Holy Ghost, our comforter teacher, guide, bringer of conviction to prick our hearts. The Spirit convicts and brings us to the Son,Jesu who in turn brings us to the Father God and he is the only way to the Father. By his word we continue our journey.
Is this dispensationalism, I don't know?
@L3astAm0ngManyB13ss3d Often discussions around dispensations seem to revolve around the distinction between the church and Israel in Scripture, rather than according to attempts to lump them together.......
@L3astAm0ngManyB13ss3d Yes, I would reckon that Israel as the wife of Jehovah and the church as the bride of Christ are Scriptural distinctions.I do not believe the body has replaced God's wife Israel, but we are his bride.
I know some believe in replacement theology which is unbiblical.
God has HIS PLAN and man will never overthrow it not by hook or crook !
Generally, yes. But all one has to do is look at the covenants in the Bible and discern the corresponding dispensation. However Covenant Theology is not the same as Dispensationalism. So these are the generally recognized dispensations (administrations):Is this dispensationalism, I don't know?
No such thing as replacement theology, this phrase was invented by those within the camp of Darbyism in DispensationalismI do not believe the body has replaced God's wife Israel, but we are his bride.
I know some believe in replacement theology which is unbiblical.
God has HIS PLAN and man will never overthrow it not by hook or crook !
Point #7 a millennial kingdom on earth doesn't exist in scripture, your chronological dispensations have fallenGenerally, yes. But all one has to do is look at the covenants in the Bible and discern the corresponding dispensation. However Covenant Theology is not the same as Dispensationalism. So these are the generally recognized dispensations (administrations):
1. Innocence -- Adam
2. Conscience -- From the Fall to the Flood
3. Human Government -- Noah
4. Promises -- Abraham
5. Law -- Moses
6. Grace -- Christ
7. Millennial Kingdom -- The Kingdom of God on earth
8. The Eternal State (not generally mentioned)
There are also Hyper-or Ultra- Dispensationalists, but they should simply be ignored.
God has no wife in a (National Israel) as claimed, the kingdom has been taken from (Israel) and given to the Church@L3astAm0ngManyB13ss3d Yes, I would reckon that Israel as the wife of Jehovah and the church as the bride of Christ are Scriptural distinctions.
The church is not Israel.God has no wife in a (National Israel) as claimed, the kingdom has been taken from (Israel) and given to the Church
Matthew 21:43KJV
43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
"Two" Israel's are seen below "Two"The church is not Israel.
1 Corinthians 10.32.
Only in your dreams! Just goes to show that if you were to publish a Bible with marginal notes, you would be tearing out Revelation 20 (and whole sections of other books). At least Scofield did not do that (even though you badmouth him at every opportunity, in violation of the commandments of Christ). So your posts belie your screen name.Point #7 a millennial kingdom on earth doesn't exist in scripture, your chronological dispensations have fallen
Jesus said to Nathaniel that he was a true Israelite ! such is one who knows God and serves God ! and What did Jesus say that Nathaniel would see ? bingo !The church is not Israel.
1 Corinthians 10.32.